Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

Conference League Round 11

Why Do I Care?

Schenectady Squirrels

Brian Beerman

(H)
at Mendon

Mendon Mushrooms

Pierre van Rossum

Schenectady leads series 13-11

Match Comments

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Schenectady			Mendon
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
92.50	A	Libero		A	91.50
57.38	D	Middle Blockers		A	91.00
91.38	A	Outside Hitters		B+	82.00
76.75	B-	Right Side		B+	82.50
76.75	B-	Setter		B+	85.75
		Skills Prediction

	24 MATCHES
13	WINS	11
9	HOME	7
3	AWAY	3
1	NEUTRAL	1

Schenectady		Mendon
#26	ELO Rank	#15

1,465.99	ELO Rating	1,498.33 (+145)

0.0%	ELO Winning Chance	0.0%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.314 16th	ATTACK PCT	.321 15th
12.06 19th	KILLS PER SET	12.63 15th
.829 32nd	SERVE PCT	.867 12th
1.12 32nd	ACES PER SET	1.25 27th
.515 17th	ASSIST PCT	.512 18th
11.82 19th	ASSISTS PER SET	12.16 15th
3.61 25th	BLOCKS PER SET	5.31 2nd
6.61 23rd	DIGS PER SET	9.16 1st
.929 8th	RECEIVE PCT	.937 3rd
2.257 2nd	PASSER RATING	2.209 7th

	TOP TWO
Maxwell (OH) 94 Freeman (OH) 88	KILLS	Forrester (OH) 71 Brickelmaier (OH) 66
Maxwell (OH) .532 Jackson (OH) .471	ATTACK PCT	Hartman (MB) .689 Delgado (MB) .548
Meyer (S) 260 Martin (S) 100	ASSISTS	Marshall (S) 228 Arnold (S) 125
Freeman (OH) 9 Maxwell (OH) 7	ACES	Marshall (S) 11 Jackson (OH) 7
Portero (MB) 25 Freeman (OH) 16	BLOCKS	Delgado (MB) 21 Brickelmaier (OH) 20
Fishback (L) 43 Meyer (S) 24	DIGS	Dunlop (L) 50 Forrester (OH) 40
Fishback (L) 2.37 Freeman (OH) 2.35	PASSER RTG	McLachlan (OH) 2.36 Dunlop (L) 2.32

#	TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
8.	Reggie Dunlop Senior B+ 2.32 Passer Rating 2.63 Digs Per Set	6.94
10.	Cam Fishback Junior A 2.37 Passer Rating 1.87 Digs Per Set	6.53

#		TOP SETTERS	Rtg
8.		Kade Marshall Senior B- 12.00 Assists Per Set 2.79 Service Pts Per Set	7.94

#		TOP OUTSIDE HITTERS	Rtg
10.		Ahmad Freeman Senior A 3.83 Kills Per Set 2.35 Passer Rating	7.71

#		TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
10.		Mike Wagner Junior C+ 1.68 Kills Per Set 0.95 Blocks Per Set	7.30

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	16	Sep 19, 2020	0	-	3	20-25	20-25	16-25			Non-Conference	0	-	1
1	20	Sep 26, 2020	0	-	3	23-25	16-25	21-26			William G. Morgan Cup1-20Sweet 16 William G. Morgan Cup	0	-	2
1	31	Oct 17, 2020	1	- (n)	3	21-25	18-25	25-21	24-26		TMVL Grand Championship1-31Group Round TMVL Grand Championship	1	-	2
2	32	Mar 20, 2021	2	-	3	26-24	23-25	21-25	25-18	14-16	Non-Conference	1	-	3
3	10	Sep 04, 2021	3	- (n)	1	25-17	18-25	25-19	26-24		William G. Morgan Cup3-10Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	1	-	4
3	32	Oct 16, 2021	0	-	3	11-25	19-25	18-25			Non-Conference	2	-	4
4	18	Dec 25, 2021	2	-	3	25-23	25-21	23-25	15-25	13-15	Non-Conference	3	-	4
5	1	Apr 09, 2022	3	-	0	28-26	25-19	25-23			Big East	4	-	4
5	10	Apr 30, 2022	0	-	3	14-25	15-25	15-25			Big East	5	-	4
5	19	May 14, 2022	3	-	0	25-20	25-23	25-16			Big East Tournament5-19Quarterfinals Big East Tournament	5	-	5
6	2	Jul 31, 2022	2	-	3	20-25	14-25	25-23	25-20	12-15	Big East	6	-	5
6	11	Aug 20, 2022	3	-	0	25-14	25-22	27-25			Big East	7	-	5
7	14	Dec 17, 2022	3	-	1	25-23	20-25	25-23	25-20		Big East	7	-	6
7	44	Feb 05, 2023	3	-	1	26-28	27-25	25-16	25-17		Big East	8	-	6
8	1	Feb 19, 2023	1	-	3	14-25	26-24	15-25	14-25		Big East	9	-	6
8	10	Mar 12, 2023	1	-	3	22-25	29-27	19-25	21-25		Big East	9	-	7
8	19	Mar 26, 2023	3	-	2	25-17	19-25	34-32	17-25	15-13	Big East Tournament8-19Quarterfinals Big East Tournament	9	-	8
9	1	May 29, 2023	0	-	3	15-25	18-25	22-25			Big East	9	-	9
9	10	Jun 18, 2023	1	-	3	25-20	23-25	12-25	16-25		Big East	10	-	9
10	4	Sep 17, 2023	1	-	3	17-25	25-22	24-26	18-25		Big East	10	-	10
10	13	Oct 08, 2023	0	-	3	18-25	13-25	19-25			Big East	11	-	10
11	4	Dec 24, 2023	0	-	3	23-25	19-25	23-25			Big East	11	-	11
11	13	Jan 14, 2024	0	-	3	22-25	16-25	19-25			Big East	12	-	11
12	7	May 12, 2024	2	-	3	25-21	10-25	25-19	20-25	11-15	Big East	13	-	11
12	29	Jun 23, 2024									Big East

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.