Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

Conference League Round 3

Why Do I Care?

St. Charles Scarecrows

Max Sellers

(H)
at Pekin

Pekin Pushin Peas

Roger Mendonça

St. Charles leads series 14-10

Match Comments

I was really expecting Max to have a better Libero

Roger (Pekin) Apr 29 - 6:08 AM

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

St. Charles			Pekin
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
59.75	D+	Libero		A-	86.50
84.88	B+	Middle Blockers		A+	97.13
83.38	B+	Outside Hitters		A+	94.00
78.00	B	Right Side		A+	95.50
88.00	A-	Setter		A+	96.25
		Skills Prediction

	24 MATCHES
14	WINS	10
8	HOME	8
4	AWAY	1
2	NEUTRAL	1

St. Charles		Pekin
#29	ELO Rank	#3

1,432.39	ELO Rating	1,567.44 (+145)

23.2%	ELO Winning Chance	76.8%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.231 27th	ATTACK PCT	.425 1st
10.79 29th	KILLS PER SET	14.18 1st
.865 14th	SERVE PCT	.857 20th
1.39 22nd	ACES PER SET	1.82 5th
.45 28th	ASSIST PCT	.589 1st
10.45 29th	ASSISTS PER SET	13.88 1st
3.48 28th	BLOCKS PER SET	4.18 16th
7.67 9th	DIGS PER SET	8.03 7th
.891 32nd	RECEIVE PCT	.919 19th
2.078 29th	PASSER RATING	2.138 21st

	TOP TWO
Noonan (OH) 59 Harrington (OH) 52	KILLS	Flores (OH) 87 Beer (OH) 82
Harrington (OH) .564 Noonan (OH) .479	ATTACK PCT	Parker (MB) .793 Ryerson (MB) .707
Sheridan (S) 169 Axelrod (S) 91	ASSISTS	Duffy (S) 275 Howard (S) 95
Sheridan (S) 7 Martinez (MB) 7	ACES	Beer (OH) 14 Duffy (S) 9
Mitchell (MB) 14 Martinez (MB) 14	BLOCKS	Ryerson (MB) 16 Beer (OH) 16
Berg (L) 38 Delgado (OH) 32	DIGS	Beer (OH) 49 Lumbergh (L) 42
Harrington (OH) 2.33 Richter (L) 2.31	PASSER RTG	Flores (OH) 2.48 Kaminski (OH) 2.39

#		TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
11.		Bill Lumbergh Soph. B 2.16 Passer Rating 2.10 Digs Per Set	6.52

#		TOP SETTERS	Rtg
1.		Phillip Duffy Senior A- 13.75 Assists Per Set 1.75 Service Pts Per Set	9.14

#		TOP OUTSIDE HITTERS	Rtg
3.		Tony Flores Junior A 4.35 Kills Per Set 2.48 Passer Rating	8.27

#		TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
11.		Tommy Ryerson Junior A+ 0.80 Blocks Per Set 3.10 Kills Per Set	7.23

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	18	Sep 26, 2020	3	-	0	34-32	25-15	25-14			Non-Conference	1	-	0
2	10	Feb 06, 2021	3	- (n)	0	25-22	29-27	25-18			William G. Morgan Cup2-10Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	2	-	0
2	29	Mar 13, 2021	3	-	0	25-16	25-21	25-19			Non-Conference	3	-	0
3	29	Oct 09, 2021	2	-	3	25-23	20-25	19-25	25-19	6-15	Non-Conference	4	-	0
4	3	Nov 27, 2021	0	- (n)	3	23-25	23-25	20-25			TMVL Cup4-3Sweet 16 TMVL Cup	5	-	0
4	29	Jan 15, 2022	0	-	3	20-25	20-25	23-25			Non-Conference	5	-	1
5	14	May 07, 2022	0	-	3	21-25	13-25	18-25			Big 8	5	-	2
5	44	Jun 25, 2022	0	-	3	24-26	26-28	23-25			Big 8	6	-	2
6	5	Aug 06, 2022	3	-	1	25-17	21-25	25-23	25-22		Big 8	6	-	3
6	39	Oct 08, 2022	0	-	3	19-25	21-25	22-25			Big 8	6	-	4
7	7	Dec 03, 2022	0	-	3	19-25	12-25	14-25			Big 8	7	-	4
7	29	Jan 14, 2023	3	-	0	25-15	25-14	25-18			Big 8	8	-	4
8	8	Mar 05, 2023	0	-	3	20-25	17-25	18-25			Big 8	8	-	5
8	19	Mar 26, 2023	0	-	3	20-25	13-25	18-25			Big 8 Tournament8-19Quarterfinals Big 8 Tournament	9	-	5
8	34	Apr 23, 2023	0	-	3	17-25	13-25	7-25			Big 8	10	-	5
9	5	Jun 04, 2023	3	-	0	25-6	25-18	25-13			Big 8	11	-	5
9	23	Jul 09, 2023	1	-	3	25-21	20-25	20-25	25-27		Big 8 Tournament9-23Semifinals Big 8 Tournament	11	-	6
9	39	Aug 06, 2023	1	-	3	20-25	19-25	28-26	24-26		Big 8	12	-	6
10	14	Oct 08, 2023	0	-	3	14-25	23-25	17-25			Big 8	12	-	7
10	23	Oct 22, 2023	0	-	3	16-25	18-25	17-25			Big 8 Tournament10-23Semifinals Big 8 Tournament	12	-	8
10	44	Nov 26, 2023	1	-	3	17-25	25-17	16-25	24-26		Big 8	13	-	8
11	4	Dec 24, 2023	0	-	3	13-25	23-25	21-25			Big 8	14	-	8
11	13	Jan 14, 2024	1	-	3	12-25	25-21	23-25	18-25		Big 8	14	-	9
11	33	Feb 11, 2024	1	- (n)	3	21-25	25-23	23-25	19-25		Holyoke Invitational11-33Sweet 16 Holyoke Invitational	14	-	10
12	4	May 06, 2024	0	-	3	21-25	22-25	18-25			Big 8	14	-	11
12	13	May 26, 2024									Big 8

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.