Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

WGM Cup Group (2)

Competition Info | Bracket Link | Why Do I Care?

Baton Rouge Bananas

Mike Halpin

(N)
Neutral Court

Quincy Rabid Biting Mules

Allan Sellers

Quincy leads series 8-7

Match Comments

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Baton Rouge			Quincy
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
79.25	B	Libero		A-	86.75
79.13	B	Middle Blockers		B-	77.38
79.00	B	Outside Hitters		A-	88.00
87.25	A-	Right Side		B	79.50
85.25	B+	Setter		A-	88.25
		Skills Prediction

	15 MATCHES
7	WINS	8
4	HOME	4
1	AWAY	1
2	NEUTRAL	3

Baton Rouge		Quincy
#11	ELO Rank	#1

1,519.28	ELO Rating	1,593.72

43.3%	ELO Winning Chance	56.7%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.344 6th	ATTACK PCT	.325 11th
12.35 13th	KILLS PER SET	12.09 16th
.833 29th	SERVE PCT	.845 25th
1.78 8th	ACES PER SET	2.35 1st
.521 12th	ASSIST PCT	.541 8th
11.96 14th	ASSISTS PER SET	11.83 15th
4 19th	BLOCKS PER SET	5.78 2nd
7 24th	DIGS PER SET	7.57 17th
.895 29th	RECEIVE PCT	.892 31st
1.995 31st	PASSER RATING	2.063 28th

	TOP TWO
Hawke (RS) 83 Raygun (MB) 45	KILLS	Palazzo (RS) 52 Hanson (OH) 52
Raygun (MB) .576 Mahoney (S) .500	ATTACK PCT	Haynes (MB) .568 Hanson (OH) .533
O’Brien (S) 136 Mahoney (S) 114	ASSISTS	Kang (S) 167 Zegarski (S) 81
Hawke (RS) 6 Catanzaro (OH) 5	ACES	Kang (S) 10 Haffner (OH) 9
Antonio (MB) 15 Raygun (MB) 12	BLOCKS	Haynes (MB) 23 Palazzo (RS) 20
Williams (L) 33 Hawke (RS) 21	DIGS	Flores (L) 33 Palazzo (RS) 28
Adams (OH) 2.23 Catanzaro (OH) 2.18	PASSER RTG	Hanson (OH) 2.50 Cockburn (OH) 2.25

#		TOP OUTSIDE HITTERS	Rtg
3.		Jeff Hanson Senior A 3.71 Kills Per Set 2.50 Passer Rating	8.31

#	TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
2.	Ryan Palazzo Junior B 3.06 Kills Per Set 1.18 Blocks Per Set	8.55
8.	CJ Hawke Junior A- 4.15 Kills Per Set 0.35 Blocks Per Set	7.39

#	TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
2.	Owen Haynes Senior A- 1.64 Blocks Per Set 2.14 Kills Per Set	8.37
9.	Jose Palazzolo Junior C 1.13 Blocks Per Set 2.13 Kills Per Set	7.45

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	18	Sep 26, 2020	3	-	2	25-13	25-23	22-25	21-25	15-11	Non-Conference	0	-	1
2	18	Feb 20, 2021	1	-	3	21-25	24-26	25-23	19-25		Non-Conference	1	-	1
3	18	Sep 18, 2021	1	-	3	21-25	19-25	26-24	24-26		Non-Conference	1	-	2
3	38	Oct 23, 2021	2	- (n)	3	25-23	23-25	25-18	23-25	9-15	TMVL Shield	1	-	3
4	36	Jan 29, 2022	1	-	3	21-25	20-25	25-22	26-28		Non-Conference	1	-	4
5	6	Apr 16, 2022	1	- (n)	3	21-25	25-19	23-25	21-25		William G. Morgan Cup5-6Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	2	-	4
5	18	May 14, 2022	3	-	0	26-24	25-20	25-19			Non-Conference	3	-	4
5	40	Jun 18, 2022	3	- (n)	1	31-29	24-26	25-20	25-20		TMVL Cup	4	-	4
6	25	Sep 17, 2022	1	-	3	26-28	18-25	25-23	22-25		Non-Conference	4	-	5
6	45	Oct 15, 2022	0	- (n)	3	20-25	17-25	24-26			TMVL Cup	4	-	6
7	21	Dec 31, 2022	0	-	3	15-25	19-25	20-25			Non-Conference	5	-	6
9	6	Jun 04, 2023	1	- (n)	3	25-19	16-25	19-25	21-25		William G. Morgan Cup9-6Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	5	-	7
9	21	Jul 09, 2023	0	-	3	25-27	21-25	18-25			Non-Conference	6	-	7
11	16	Jan 14, 2024	2	-	3	25-15	23-25	22-25	25-23	9-15	William G. Morgan Cup11-16Sweet 16 William G. Morgan Cup	7	-	7
11	26	Feb 05, 2024	0	-	3	20-25	23-25	20-25			Non-Conference	7	-	8
12	6	May 06, 2024	0	- (n)	3	22-25	18-25	16-25			William G. Morgan Cup12-6Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	7	-	9

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.