Players

Emmanuel Goodsel 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	15	14	14	16

Season 10 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
934 21st	38 303rd	24 80th	83 108th	47 144th

Career Honors

S11MVP BIG-EAST2nd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	6	0	6	0.00	16	.625	33	11.00	77	.429	1.5	6.28
4	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	6	1	1	0.33	12	.917	47	15.67	75	.627	4.0	10.00
6	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	6	1	2	0.33	11	.818	34	11.33	62	.548	5.0	7.91
10	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	8	3	0	1.00	14	1.000	41	13.67	67	.612	5.5	9.99
12	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	9	0	1	0.00	14	.929	32	10.67	52	.615	2.0	6.37
14	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	5	.400	5	2	1	0.67	10	.900	35	11.67	56	.625	6.5	8.05
16	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	6	.500	2	1	0	0.25	10	1.000	47	11.75	86	.547	8.0	7.65
17	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	1	1	0.25	18	.944	53	13.25	82	.646	3.0	9.43
19	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	4	1	3	0.33	12	.750	39	13.00	81	.481	2.5	7.78
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	8	.375	4	1	2	0.20	16	.875	67	13.40	106	.632	7.5	8.88
22	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	4	1.000	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	40	10.00	77	.519	4.5	5.08
25	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	6	.167	2	1	1	0.20	12	.917	45	9.00	82	.549	3.5	4.30
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	2	.000	6	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	37	12.33	52	.712	1.0	7.82
30	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	1	9	.444	8	0	4	0.00	17	.765	51	10.20	86	.593	7.5	6.91
32	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	0	0.33	16	1.000	44	14.67	56	.786	1.5	8.50
34	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	6	.500	5	0	2	0.00	16	.875	46	11.50	84	.548	3.5	6.54
37	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	2	1	2	0.33	11	.818	41	13.67	72	.569	3.5	8.06
39	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	5	.200	8	2	3	0.50	19	.842	59	14.75	88	.670	3.5	9.18
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	8	2	2	0.67	16	.875	33	11.00	50	.660	4.0	7.02
44	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	4	.750	9	4	1	1.00	20	.950	55	13.75	73	.753	7.0	8.92
45	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	6	2	5	0.50	18	.722	55	13.75	88	.625	4.5	8.62
Total		76	38	0.50	7	84	.369	125	24	38	0.32	302	.874	934	12.29	1552	.602	89.5	7.78

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	6.28
4	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	10.00
6	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	1	6	7	0	2.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.91
10	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	1	0.67	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	9.99
12	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.37
14	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	8.05
16	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.65
17	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	9.43
19	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.78
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	2	3	5	0	1.00	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	8.88
22	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.08
25	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.30
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	7.82
30	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.91
32	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	8.50
34	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.54
37	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.06
39	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.18
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.02
44	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	8.92
45	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.62
Total		76	8	39	47	3	0.62	83	1.09	.	.	.	.	.	89.5	7.78