ELO - End of Session 1 Rankings
| Rk | Pr | Chg | Name | Record | Points | Previous | Chg |
| 1. | 1. | ±0 |  Starkville | 2-1 | 1547.36 | 1547.36 | — |
| 2. | 2. | ±0 |  Cincinnati | 2-1 | 1544.32 | 1544.32 | — |
| 3. | 3. | ±0 |  Teutopolis | 2-1 | 1533.15 | 1533.15 | — |
| 4. | 4. | ±0 |  Burlington | 2-1 | 1530.94 | 1530.94 | — |
| 5. | 5. | ±0 |  San Jose | 2-1 | 1525.80 | 1525.80 | — |
| 6. | 6. | ±0 |  Carlsbad | 2-1 | 1523.86 | 1523.86 | — |
| 7. | 7. | ±0 |  Nashville | 2-1 | 1523.55 | 1523.55 | — |
| 8. | 8. | ±0 |  Columbia | 1-2 | 1521.60 | 1521.60 | — |
| 9. | 9. | ±0 |  Tucson | 2-1 | 1520.91 | 1520.91 | — |
| 10. | 10. | ±0 |  Albuquerque | 2-1 | 1519.79 | 1519.79 | — |
| 11. | 11. | ±0 |  Denali | 2-1 | 1518.28 | 1518.28 | — |
| 12. | 12. | ±0 |  Dallas | 2-1 | 1515.84 | 1515.84 | — |
| 13. | 13. | ±0 |  Alton | 2-1 | 1514.46 | 1514.46 | — |
| 14. | 14. | ±0 |  Mendon | 2-1 | 1513.33 | 1513.33 | — |
| 15. | 15. | ±0 |  New Orleans | 1-2 | 1510.04 | 1510.04 | — |
| 16. | 16. | ±0 |  Quincy | 1-2 | 1507.94 | 1507.94 | — |
| 17. | 17. | ±0 |  Pekin | 1-2 | 1505.84 | 1505.84 | — |
| 18. | 18. | ±0 |  Manitowoc | 2-1 | 1503.60 | 1503.60 | — |
| 19. | 19. | ±0 |  Arlington | 2-1 | 1497.78 | 1497.78 | — |
| 20. | 20. | ±0 |  Portland | 2-1 | 1497.08 | 1497.08 | — |
| 21. | 21. | ±0 |  Schenectady | 2-1 | 1494.64 | 1494.64 | — |
| 22. | 22. | ±0 |  Baton Rouge | 2-1 | 1492.73 | 1492.73 | — |
| 23. | 23. | ±0 |  Antioch | 1-2 | 1491.03 | 1491.03 | — |
| 24. | 24. | ±0 |  Sheboygan | 1-2 | 1487.23 | 1487.23 | — |
| 25. | 25. | ±0 |  Ames | 1-2 | 1481.44 | 1481.44 | — |
| 26. | 26. | ±0 |  Santa Clara | 2-1 | 1478.98 | 1478.98 | — |
| 27. | 27. | ±0 |  Spokane | 1-2 | 1471.98 | 1471.98 | — |
| 28. | 28. | ±0 |  San Diego | 1-2 | 1465.93 | 1465.93 | — |
| 29. | 29. | ±0 |  Mat-Su | 0-3 | 1463.01 | 1463.01 | — |
| 30. | 30. | ±0 |  Merritt Island | 1-2 | 1448.41 | 1448.41 | — |
| 31. | 31. | ±0 |  St. Charles | 0-3 | 1447.29 | 1447.29 | — |
| 32. | 32. | ±0 |  Kentucky | 0-3 | 1401.86 | 1401.86 | — |
 | No surprises here with Starkville at #1! Allan ~ Jun. 9th at 10:05 PM |
 | We start off eleventh but a lot of teams have a two one record. Andy ~ Jun. 9th at 5:25 PM |
 | Is this just a random number generator? Craig ~ Jun. 9th at 9:35 AM |
| 12th? How are the tomotoes 8th? Craig ~ Jun. 9th at 9:34 AM |
 | Double sigh Matthew ~ Jun. 8th at 11:40 PM |
 | Hooray! We're in the top 25! Jason ~ Jun. 8th at 12:33 AM |
 | Tough look for the Crows Max ~ Jun. 7th at 5:39 PM |
| We start off top of the bottom half. Andy ~ Jun. 7th at 1:32 PM |
 | 12 weeks to "correct" this. Eduard ~ Jun. 6th at 7:29 PM |
| Don't worry James. Those are only last season's ELOs - scaled down. Eduard ~ Jun. 6th at 7:28 PM |
 | ELO shows how the managerial skill effects that James ~ Jun. 6th at 6:50 PM |
| apparently we have the best team ratings wise James ~ Jun. 6th at 6:50 PM |
 | 29th?! Really? That seems far too high for our Squirrels. Brian ~ Jun. 4th at 5:11 PM |
| Sigh...it's a long way to the top Matthew ~ Jun. 3rd at 8:33 AM |
| The happiest part of my day is when Eduard and Roger use my quotes against me. I laughed! š Allan ~ Jun. 2nd at 10:55 PM |
 | Iāve got the fourth worst roster this season. The only thing āunstoppableā about Pekin this year will be our plummet to the bottom. Good thing thereās no relegationā¦ Roger ~ Jun. 2nd at 8:33 PM |
| Let's just ignore the #6 Quincy - and their 20 trophies Eduard ~ Jun. 2nd at 8:31 PM |
| Ah yes - the "usual suspects" at top 5 Eduard ~ Jun. 2nd at 8:30 PM |
| No surprises here as all the usual suspects are Top 5. Columbia, Starkville, Cinci, Nawleans, and Pekin will be unstoppable again this campaign... Allan ~ Jun. 1st at 10:43 PM |