Players

Chase Mahoney 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	16	18	14	-

Season 10 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
231 61st	.710 2nd	30 42nd	45 260th	66 58th

Career Honors

S102nd All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	12	.583	6	2	4	0.67	14	.714	.	.	.	.	13.0	10.00
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	11	.818	4	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.27
4	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	10	.900	10	1	4	0.33	16	.750	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.86
6	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	1	17	.706	4	1	5	0.33	10	.500	.	.	.	.	17.5	10.00
8	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	12	.750	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.33
9	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	3	17	.588	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.24
10	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	9	1.000	6	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.74
12	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	7	1.000	7	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.88
14	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	12	.667	9	1	3	0.33	17	.824	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.99
16	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	14	.357	5	2	1	0.50	17	.941	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.06
17	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	12	.583	6	2	2	0.50	15	.867	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.78
19	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	12	.583	8	2	0	0.67	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.91
25	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	2	11	.636	5	3	4	0.60	18	.778	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.15
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	11	.545	8	2	2	0.67	14	.857	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.35
30	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	0	11	1.000	8	2	0	0.40	21	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.44
32	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	9	.778	6	1	0	0.33	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.97
34	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	18	.500	7	0	3	0.00	19	.842	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.30
37	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	0	10	1.000	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.88
39	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	1	19	.737	10	4	2	1.00	22	.909	.	.	.	.	21.5	9.22
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	0	13	.923	12	3	1	1.00	20	.950	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.26
44	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	17	.647	5	1	3	0.25	16	.813	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.30
45	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	19	4.75	2	22	.773	7	2	2	0.50	19	.895	.	.	.	.	23.0	9.00
Total		78	231	2.96	28	286	.710	134	30	45	0.38	315	.857	.	.	.	.	297.0	7.50

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	10.00
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.27
4	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.86
6	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	10.00
8	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.33
9	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.24
10	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.74
12	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.88
14	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	2	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.99
16	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.06
17	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.78
19	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.91
25	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	2	4	6	1	1.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.15
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.35
30	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.44
32	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.97
34	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.30
37	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.88
39	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	21.5	9.22
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.26
44	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.30
45	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	23.0	9.00
Total		78	6	60	66	6	0.85	45	0.58	.	.	.	.	.	297.0	7.50