Players

Carson Huber 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	16	16	18	14	8

Season 10 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
393 3rd	.567 20th	24 80th	107 40th	67 52nd

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	13	.154	3	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.49
2	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	16	.063	3	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.71
5	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	20	5.00	2	29	.621	4	1	2	0.25	13	.846	0	0.00	1	.000	23.5	9.61
6	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	5	26	.346	7	0	2	0.00	15	.867	2	0.50	2	1.000	17.5	7.80
7	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	24	6.00	3	29	.724	4	1	5	0.25	15	.667	1	0.25	1	1.000	27.5	8.71
9	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	3	19	.579	6	2	1	0.67	13	.923	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.67
10	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	1	21	.762	7	1	1	0.25	16	.938	1	0.25	1	1.000	18.0	7.25
12	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	18	6.00	3	21	.714	5	2	0	0.67	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	21.0	9.57
14	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	13	.615	5	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.43
16	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	2	21	.619	4	0	3	0.00	13	.769	1	0.25	1	1.000	18.0	7.44
17	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	26	5.20	2	32	.750	4	0	4	0.00	15	.733	.	.	.	.	27.5	8.62
19	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	15	.400	9	4	1	1.33	18	.944	1	0.33	1	1.000	14.5	7.29
23	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	14	.500	5	1	1	0.33	14	.929	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.11
24	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	5	21	.476	7	0	4	0.00	22	.818	.	.	.	.	15.5	4.58
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	15	.600	11	0	1	0.00	22	.955	0	0.00	1	.000	12.5	7.36
27	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	4	22	.500	4	0	4	0.00	16	.750	1	0.20	3	.333	15.5	5.99
29	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	19	.316	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	1	0.33	2	.500	13.0	7.22
32	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	3	26	.654	7	1	3	0.20	16	.813	0	0.00	1	.000	22.0	7.29
34	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	24	4.80	5	35	.543	6	1	0	0.20	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	26.0	7.95
36	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	3	24	.667	10	2	3	0.50	21	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	21.5	9.25
37	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	2	22	.727	1	1	1	0.25	11	.909	1	0.25	1	1.000	20.0	7.36
39	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	2	17	.765	4	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	18.5	9.24
42	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	20	.550	13	2	4	0.50	23	.826	1	0.25	1	1.000	18.5	8.00
44	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	19	4.75	5	26	.538	3	1	1	0.25	13	.923	.	.	.	.	20.5	6.71
46	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	13	.385	5	1	0	0.33	13	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	11.0	6.97
47	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	3	18	.667	2	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.18
Total		99	393	3.97	83	547	.567	142	24	53	0.24	382	.861	11	0.11	18	.611	451.5	7.38

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	15	2.30	27	1	.963	7.0	4.49
2	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	2.44	9	0	1.000	6.0	4.71
5	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	9	2.25	14	2.58	19	0	1.000	23.5	9.61
6	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	6	1.50	13	2.09	35	3	.914	17.5	7.80
7	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	9	2.28	18	1	.944	27.5	8.71
9	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	11	2.50	16	0	1.000	16.5	8.67
10	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	15	2.03	31	5	.839	18.0	7.25
12	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	4	2.43	7	0	1.000	21.0	9.57
14	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	8	2.67	5	1.83	12	1	.917	11.5	6.43
16	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	1	0.25	15	2.25	28	2	.929	18.0	7.44
17	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	21	2.50	30	1	.967	27.5	8.62
19	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	7	2.21	14	0	1.000	14.5	7.29
23	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	8	2.25	12	2	.833	13.0	7.11
24	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	2	0.40	5	1.56	16	3	.813	15.5	4.58
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	13	3.25	6	2.27	11	1	.909	12.5	7.36
27	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	1	0.20	21	2.37	35	1	.971	15.5	5.99
29	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	13	2.15	27	4	.852	13.0	7.22
32	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	12	2.16	25	2	.920	22.0	7.29
34	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	18	2.35	31	1	.968	26.0	7.95
36	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	12	3.00	10	2.44	18	0	1.000	21.5	9.25
37	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	15	2.27	30	0	1.000	20.0	7.36
39	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	2	0.67	13	2.50	20	0	1.000	18.5	9.24
42	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	3	0.75	13	2.27	30	0	1.000	18.5	8.00
44	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	19	2.05	37	5	.865	20.5	6.71
46	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	16	2.28	25	3	.880	11.0	6.97
47	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	19	2.21	34	3	.912	15.5	6.18
Total		99	2	65	67	1	0.68	107	1.08	323	2.25	597	39	.935	451.5	7.38