Players

Jeff Hanson 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	16	16	17	16	7

Season 11 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
384 4th	.540 34th	53 3rd	105 44th	68 58th

Career Honors

S112nd All-BIG-8

S122nd All-TMVL2nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	16	.438	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.82
3	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	0	30	.667	7	1	3	0.20	18	.833	.	.	.	.	23.0	6.48
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	2	18	.667	10	0	2	0.00	19	.895	0	0.00	1	.000	16.5	8.53
6	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	4	28	.464	5	1	2	0.25	16	.875	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.74
7	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	5	30	.500	12	8	1	1.60	26	.962	.	.	.	.	28.5	7.68
9	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	3	22	.455	9	4	4	0.80	23	.826	.	.	.	.	20.0	6.19
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	4	20	.550	5	2	0	0.67	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	18.5	9.86
12	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	4	25	.480	9	3	4	0.75	21	.810	1	0.25	1	1.000	19.5	7.87
15	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	26	5.20	4	30	.733	8	1	2	0.20	19	.895	0	0.00	1	.000	28.5	8.43
16	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	27	5.40	4	37	.622	6	2	3	0.40	18	.833	.	.	.	.	31.5	8.71
18	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	2	21	.619	7	2	2	0.50	18	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	18.0	8.43
19	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	4	27	.481	11	3	2	0.75	21	.905	0	0.00	1	.000	21.0	9.63
22	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	23	4.60	4	37	.514	9	3	3	0.60	22	.864	.	.	.	.	27.5	8.33
23	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	15	.267	4	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.19
25	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	20	.450	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.23
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	13	.769	10	3	3	1.00	18	.833	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.05
30	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	22	.409	5	4	1	1.33	13	.923	0	0.00	1	.000	16.5	8.71
33	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	16	.438	4	1	1	0.33	11	.909	0	0.00	1	.000	15.0	8.13
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	4	22	.545	9	2	1	0.50	20	.950	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.08
38	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	4	29	.345	2	1	4	0.20	14	.714	.	.	.	.	18.5	6.37
40	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	16	.688	7	4	2	1.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.85
43	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	4	21	.619	9	1	0	0.25	20	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	20.0	7.30
44	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	17	5.67	1	18	.889	0	0	1	0.00	9	.889	1	0.33	1	1.000	17.0	7.17
45	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	19	.474	10	4	2	1.00	19	.895	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.67
48	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	15	.400	5	2	5	0.50	16	.688	1	0.25	2	.500	11.5	5.50
Total		98	384	3.92	78	567	.540	170	53	52	0.54	424	.877	3	0.03	11	.273	472.0	7.64

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	5	2.50	8	0	1.000	12.0	7.82
3	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	5	1.00	2	1.73	11	0	1.000	23.0	6.48
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	3	1.92	12	0	1.000	16.5	8.53
6	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	14	2.41	22	1	.955	18.0	7.74
7	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	.	.	16	2.37	27	1	.963	28.5	7.68
9	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	16	2.32	28	2	.929	20.0	6.19
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	6	2.00	11	2.64	14	0	1.000	18.5	9.86
12	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	9	2.25	15	2.13	32	0	1.000	19.5	7.87
15	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	7	1.40	9	2.13	16	2	.875	28.5	8.43
16	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	5	1.00	12	2.25	20	1	.950	31.5	8.71
18	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	12	2.65	17	0	1.000	18.0	8.43
19	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	11	2.75	18	2.73	22	0	1.000	21.0	9.63
22	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	9	2.17	18	1	.944	27.5	8.33
23	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	10	2.19	21	2	.905	9.0	4.19
25	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	9	2.29	17	1	.941	12.5	7.23
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	2.40	15	0	1.000	14.0	8.05
30	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	11	2.63	16	0	1.000	16.5	8.71
33	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	3	1.00	6	2.33	12	1	.917	15.0	8.13
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	12	2.36	22	2	.909	19.0	8.08
38	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	2	0.40	12	2.50	18	0	1.000	18.5	6.37
40	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	3	1.50	8	2	.750	18.0	6.85
43	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	5	1.93	15	1	.933	20.0	7.30
44	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	2.15	13	2	.846	17.0	7.17
45	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	10	2.33	21	0	1.000	18.5	7.67
48	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	10	2.50	16	0	1.000	11.5	5.50
Total		98	2	66	68	5	0.69	105	1.07	247	2.31	441	19	.957	472.0	7.64