Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 0 hours and 0 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 05:59:04 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Alejandro Fernandez 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	18	-	-	16	13

Season 10 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
109 38th	2.31 34th	.938 56th	50 110th	13 189th

Career Honors

S112nd All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

S122nd All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	3.95
4	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.20	12	.833	3	0.60	7	.429	1.0	6.90
9	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	2	0.50	15	.867	3	0.75	6	.500	2.0	7.33
10	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	4.85
15	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.33	9	.889	5	1.67	5	1.000	1.0	10.00
17	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	4.15
21	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	1	0.20	17	.941	7	1.40	8	.875	1.0	5.40
25	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	3	0.00	11	.727	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	5.13
29	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	3	3	0.75	17	.824	5	1.25	7	.714	3.0	8.50
35	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.25	11	.818	4	1.00	9	.444	1.0	10.00
40	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	3	0	0.60	17	1.000	5	1.00	10	.500	3.0	6.86
44	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	9	3.00	10	.900	0.0	9.77
45	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	2	0.67	5	.400	1.0	9.24
Total		48	.	.	.	.	.	57	13	17	0.27	147	.884	50	1.04	82	.610	13.0	7.08

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	2.11	9	1	.889	0.0	3.95
4	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.80	12	2.11	28	1	.964	1.0	6.90
9	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	16	2.00	35	5	.857	2.0	7.33
10	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	2.09	11	1	.909	0.0	4.85
15	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	11	2.56	16	0	1.000	1.0	10.00
17	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	11	2.14	22	3	.864	0.0	4.15
21	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	19	2.26	34	2	.941	1.0	5.40
25	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	14	2.25	24	3	.875	0.0	5.13
29	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	16	2.59	22	0	1.000	3.0	8.50
35	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3.50	16	2.68	22	0	1.000	1.0	10.00
40	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	14	2.35	26	1	.962	3.0	6.86
44	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	7	2.64	11	0	1.000	0.0	9.77
45	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	9	2.69	13	0	1.000	1.0	9.24
Total		48	.	.	.	.	.	109	2.27	155	2.31	273	17	.938	13.0	7.08