Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 18 hours and 1 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Tuesday, April 28th, 2026 - 11:58:10 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Alejandro Fernandez 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	18	-	-	16	13

Season 9 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
73 145th	2.34 27th	.936 68th	39 117th	9 241st

Career Honors

S112nd All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

S122nd All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	6.88
4	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	.375	0.0	5.61
7	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	4.03
10	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	10	.700	0.0	3.20
15	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	1	0.50	16	.938	8	2.00	10	.800	2.0	9.97
16	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	3	0.00	8	.625	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	5.53
18	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	1	0.67	14	.929	2	0.67	2	1.000	2.0	3.53
21	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.20	14	.929	5	1.00	12	.417	1.0	8.30
31	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	6	.833	5	1.67	7	.714	0.0	8.71
34	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	2	0.25	14	.857	5	1.25	8	.625	1.0	7.38
46	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	3	2	1.00	13	.846	1	0.33	3	.333	3.0	5.03
Total		39	.	.	.	.	.	38	9	13	0.23	93	.860	39	1.00	70	.557	9.0	6.20

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	13	2.32	19	3	.842	0.0	6.88
4	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	5	2.71	7	0	1.000	0.0	5.61
7	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	15	2.36	25	2	.920	0.0	4.03
10	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	12	2.09	23	3	.870	0.0	3.20
15	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	4.00	10	2.57	14	1	.929	2.0	9.97
16	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.47	15	0	1.000	0.0	5.53
18	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	2.15	13	1	.923	2.0	3.53
21	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	12	2.61	18	0	1.000	1.0	8.30
31	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	8	2.31	13	0	1.000	0.0	8.71
34	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	15	2.40	25	2	.920	1.0	7.38
46	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	12	2.16	31	1	.968	3.0	5.03
Total		39	.	.	.	.	.	73	1.87	117	2.34	203	13	.936	9.0	6.20