Players

Gustavo Fring 5 Right Side (RS)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	16	17	16	-

Season 10 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
198 95th	.502 58th	22 102nd	99 46th	48 135th

Career Honors

S111st All-BIG-8

S121st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	16	.500	6	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.78
3	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	17	.353	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.97
4	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.06
6	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	6	.500	11	3	5	0.75	22	.773	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.58
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	18	.556	3	1	1	0.25	11	.909	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.12
9	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	10	.800	7	3	4	1.00	13	.692	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.93
11	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	19	.526	9	0	0	0.00	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.34
12	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	14	.643	13	0	5	0.00	21	.762	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.82
14	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	8	.625	3	2	3	0.67	9	.667	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.92
16	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	10	.500	6	1	4	0.25	17	.765	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.25
19	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	12	.417	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.84
20	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	6	.833	6	2	0	0.67	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.05
23	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	4	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.86
24	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	1	19	.684	2	0	0	0.00	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.52
25	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	5	21	.429	14	3	3	0.75	23	.870	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.67
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	22	.409	13	2	2	0.50	23	.913	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.21
27	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	16	.500	7	0	3	0.00	21	.857	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.78
29	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	7	.429	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.50
32	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	5	17	.353	6	0	2	0.00	18	.889	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.64
34	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	2	9	.444	5	1	3	0.20	17	.824	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.64
37	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	12	.500	2	0	5	0.00	13	.615	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.50
39	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	11	.636	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.81
42	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	12	.500	10	0	5	0.00	20	.750	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.61
44	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	2	.500	5	1	2	0.25	16	.875	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.64
46	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	9	.444	4	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.62
47	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	3	.333	3	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.64
Total		95	198	2.08	46	303	.502	154	22	60	0.23	390	.846	.	.	.	.	244.5	6.05

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.78
3	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.97
4	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.06
6	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.58
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.12
9	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.93
11	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.34
12	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.82
14	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.92
16	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.25
19	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.84
20	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.05
23	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.86
24	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.52
25	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.67
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.21
27	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.78
29	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.50
32	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	2	0.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.64
34	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.64
37	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.50
39	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.81
42	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.61
44	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.64
46	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.62
47	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.64
Total		95	1	47	48	4	0.51	99	1.04	.	.	.	.	.	244.5	6.05