Players

Gustavo Fring 5 Right Side (RS)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	16	17	16	-

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
147 152nd	.306 200th	17 138th	91 67th	55 100th

Career Honors

S111st All-BIG-8

S121st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	6	-.167	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.00
2	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	2	24	.458	5	1	0	0.20	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.45
3	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	4	14	-.143	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.96
6	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	0	11	.727	4	2	1	0.50	11	.909	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.78
8	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	14	.214	5	2	4	0.40	18	.778	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.22
11	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	20	.400	3	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.35
12	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	12	.417	6	1	1	0.25	16	.938	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.12
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	9	.556	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.12
16	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	14	.286	3	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.69
18	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	23	.348	8	2	2	0.40	20	.900	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.49
19	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	11	.000	2	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.40
21	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	9	.556	4	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.64
22	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	1	14	.143	5	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.06
25	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	11	.364	8	1	2	0.25	19	.895	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.14
26	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	19	.474	6	2	2	0.50	17	.882	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.06
31	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	13	-.154	4	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.70
33	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	14	.214	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.14
34	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	9	.667	1	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.73
36	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	20	.250	4	1	0	0.25	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.44
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	13	.538	6	1	2	0.33	15	.867	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.74
41	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	6	.000	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.70
44	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	2	17	.412	5	0	4	0.00	18	.778	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.92
46	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	14	.143	2	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.57
Total		89	147	1.65	50	317	.306	100	17	39	0.19	307	.873	.	.	.	.	197.0	5.63

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.00
2	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.45
3	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.96
6	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.78
8	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	2	1	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.22
11	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.35
12	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.12
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.12
16	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.69
18	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.49
19	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.40
21	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.64
22	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.06
25	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.14
26	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	11	2.75	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.06
31	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.70
33	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.14
34	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.73
36	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.44
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.74
41	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.70
44	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.92
46	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.57
Total		89	11	44	55	3	0.62	91	1.02	.	.	.	.	.	197.0	5.63