Players

Gaius Baltar 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	17	16	17	15	6

Season 11 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
386 3rd	.574 17th	43 11th	104 46th	60 86th

Career Honors

S111st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

S122nd All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	9	38	.263	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	0	0.00	2	.000	20.5	7.66
2	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	5	21	.476	5	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	16.5	9.24
4	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	16	.500	13	4	4	1.33	21	.810	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.97
5	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	14	.643	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.89
7	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	21	5.25	0	23	.913	10	2	1	0.50	20	.950	1	0.25	1	1.000	24.0	8.72
8	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	26	5.20	3	32	.719	9	4	3	0.80	18	.833	.	.	.	.	31.5	8.35
10	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	0	13	1.000	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.77
12	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	8	.875	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.48
13	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	6	22	.227	6	3	2	1.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.97
16	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	1	20	.750	5	1	2	0.25	18	.889	.	.	.	.	19.5	7.29
17	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	15	.733	9	4	3	1.33	18	.833	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.29
20	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	15	.467	5	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.95
22	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	22	5.50	2	29	.690	7	3	2	0.75	19	.895	.	.	.	.	25.5	7.44
24	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	24	4.80	3	34	.618	9	1	1	0.20	19	.947	.	.	.	.	26.5	7.96
25	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	21	5.25	3	26	.692	4	3	3	0.75	16	.813	0	0.00	1	.000	25.0	8.99
28	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	21	4.20	3	29	.621	9	3	1	0.60	20	.950	1	0.20	1	1.000	25.0	8.06
29	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	5	24	.333	6	1	1	0.25	17	.941	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.20
32	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	10	28	.250	3	2	2	0.40	15	.867	0	0.00	2	.000	20.0	6.74
34	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	16	.563	5	2	2	0.67	12	.833	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.04
35	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	18	6.00	3	24	.625	6	1	1	0.33	15	.933	1	0.33	1	1.000	20.0	8.77
39	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	20	5.00	4	27	.593	4	0	0	0.00	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	21.5	8.49
40	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	16	.688	4	2	2	0.67	13	.846	1	0.33	1	1.000	16.0	7.63
44	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	3	25	.600	12	5	2	1.25	24	.917	0	0.00	1	.000	25.0	9.04
45	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	4	25	.520	2	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	18.5	6.88
Total		90	386	4.29	76	540	.574	149	43	41	0.48	377	.891	4	0.04	10	.400	460.0	7.99

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	6	1.20	12	2.32	22	0	1.000	20.5	7.66
2	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	11	3.67	3	2.40	5	0	1.000	16.5	9.24
4	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	9	3.00	12	2.20	25	2	.920	17.0	8.97
5	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	12	2.56	18	0	1.000	13.0	7.89
7	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	12	2.29	24	1	.958	24.0	8.72
8	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	9	1.80	12	2.00	32	3	.906	31.5	8.35
10	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	6	2.44	9	1	.889	13.5	8.77
12	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	4	2.10	10	0	1.000	9.0	5.48
13	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	8	2.54	13	0	1.000	16.0	8.97
16	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	.	.	13	2.07	29	2	.931	19.5	7.29
17	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	10	2.82	11	0	1.000	17.0	9.29
20	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	2.73	11	0	1.000	9.0	6.95
22	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	13	2.03	30	3	.900	25.5	7.44
24	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	4	0.80	17	2.08	37	4	.892	26.5	7.96
25	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	4	2.43	7	0	1.000	25.0	8.99
28	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	25	2.43	37	3	.919	25.0	8.06
29	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	11	2.47	19	1	.947	14.0	7.20
32	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	28	2.49	43	1	.977	20.0	6.74
34	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	1	2.33	2	0.67	9	1.86	21	3	.857	16.5	7.04
35	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	8	2.50	14	0	1.000	20.0	8.77
39	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	18	2.32	31	2	.935	21.5	8.49
40	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	11	2.14	21	2	.905	16.0	7.63
44	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	6	1.50	12	2.26	23	1	.957	25.0	9.04
45	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	10	2.04	24	2	.917	18.5	6.88
Total		90	2	58	60	4	0.67	104	1.16	279	2.27	516	31	.940	460.0	7.99