Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 0 hours and 3 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 05:56:07 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Gaius Baltar 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	17	16	17	15	6

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
150 148th	.380 150th	12 204th	58 202nd	41 191st

Career Honors

S111st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

S122nd All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	10	.600	9	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.77
2	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	4	29	.345	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.93
4	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	1	23	.522	5	2	4	0.67	11	.636	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.66
5	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	1	15	.467	2	1	1	0.20	12	.917	.	.	.	.	9.5	2.44
14	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	8	.500	5	0	4	0.00	15	.733	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.27
15	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	6	30	.467	8	2	1	0.40	16	.938	.	.	.	.	24.0	7.26
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	10	.500	9	2	3	0.67	13	.769	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.69
18	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	25	.160	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.15
21	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	17	.471	7	2	3	0.67	13	.769	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.61
22	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	7	21	.190	7	1	2	0.20	20	.900	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.01
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	6	22	.273	5	1	5	0.25	16	.688	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.79
26	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	16	5.33	7	28	.321	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.17
29	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	12	.500	4	0	3	0.00	9	.667	0	0.00	1	.000	8.5	5.11
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	11	.273	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.65
39	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	13	.462	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	10.0	4.77
Total		53	150	2.83	46	274	.380	70	12	32	0.23	180	.822	0	0.00	2	.000	182.5	5.75

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	3	1.73	11	2	.818	8.0	3.77
2	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	9	2.00	26	2	.923	15.0	7.93
4	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	8	2.67	8	2.13	16	0	1.000	16.5	8.66
5	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	17	1.97	36	7	.806	9.5	2.44
14	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	10	2.17	24	0	1.000	7.0	4.27
15	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	15	2.05	37	2	.946	24.0	7.26
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	9	2.00	20	2	.900	10.0	4.69
18	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	14	1.96	28	5	.821	9.0	5.15
21	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	14	2.52	21	0	1.000	14.0	8.61
22	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	.	.	21	2.12	41	4	.902	12.5	4.01
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	7	1.75	20	2.44	32	2	.938	16.0	7.79
26	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	15	2.07	30	5	.833	17.0	7.17
29	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	5	1.67	9	1.95	21	3	.857	8.5	5.11
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	10	2.50	16	0	1.000	5.5	4.65
39	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	5	1.80	15	1	.933	10.0	4.77
Total		53	0	41	41	1	0.77	58	1.09	179	2.10	374	35	.906	182.5	5.75