Players

Felipe Mulatero 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	15	13	13	13	9

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	6	16	-.250	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.31
3	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	12	.250	11	1	0	0.33	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.38
4	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	26	.346	4	1	1	0.25	11	.909	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.95
5	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	7	20	-.100	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	5.5	3.31
8	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	13	.231	3	1	2	0.33	7	.714	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.71
9	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	7	26	.077	8	0	8	0.00	21	.619	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.75
10	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	14	.643	3	0	4	0.00	11	.636	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.13
11	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	10	.100	3	1	1	0.33	10	.900	1	0.33	1	1.000	5.5	2.59
15	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	15	.533	5	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.64
16	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	20	.300	3	1	2	0.33	10	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	12.5	7.68
17	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	17	.059	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.08
18	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	15	.400	13	2	3	0.67	20	.850	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.09
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	6	26	.077	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.56
22	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	5	25	.320	6	1	2	0.25	17	.882	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.96
29	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	2	16	.250	1	0	2	0.00	11	.818	1	0.20	1	1.000	9.0	2.15
31	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	14	.286	6	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.28
34	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	16	.375	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.48
39	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	11	.000	3	1	3	0.33	9	.667	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.81
44	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	5	.400	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.28
Total		66	129	1.95	61	317	.215	79	10	35	0.15	213	.836	2	0.03	4	.500	161.0	4.48

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	8	1.75	24	2	.917	3.0	2.31
3	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	1	2.00	10	3.33	6	2.06	16	1	.938	8.0	5.38
4	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	4	1.00	12	2.30	23	1	.957	15.0	6.95
5	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	18	2.18	34	3	.912	5.5	3.31
8	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	9	2.29	17	1	.941	6.0	4.71
9	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	14	1.97	35	5	.857	9.0	3.75
10	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	13	1.79	33	7	.788	11.0	4.13
11	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	6	1.92	12	2	.833	5.5	2.59
15	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	7	2.33	11	2.79	14	0	1.000	12.0	8.64
16	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	8	2.60	10	0	1.000	12.5	7.68
17	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	16	1.86	37	8	.784	5.0	2.08
18	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	8	2.33	12	0	1.000	10.5	7.09
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	2	0.33	2	0.67	11	1.96	25	5	.800	8.5	4.56
22	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	9	2.22	18	0	1.000	15.0	6.96
29	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	.	.	5	1.80	15	2	.867	9.0	2.15
31	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	2.00	24	3	.875	6.0	3.28
34	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	1	9	10	0	2.50	3	0.75	18	2.08	38	4	.895	13.5	4.48
39	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	8	1.65	23	6	.739	3.0	1.81
44	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	14	2.18	28	3	.893	3.0	3.28
Total		66	2	40	42	6	0.64	72	1.09	204	2.05	438	53	.879	161.0	4.48