Players

Sebastian Brehme 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	17	17	19	17	9

Season 12 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
340 9th	.570 23rd	20 98th	76 118th	65 47th

Career Honors

S132nd All-BIG-8

S141st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	3	26	.538	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	0	0.00	1	.000	19.5	7.81
3	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	15	.733	5	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.5	9.54
4	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	6	25	.280	4	2	1	0.50	15	.933	1	0.25	1	1.000	16.5	6.96
5	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	16	.625	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.28
8	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	6	20	.250	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	12.5	8.25
9	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	0	19	.684	8	2	0	0.67	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.99
11	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	20	.500	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	7.25
12	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	4	31	.516	5	1	4	0.20	19	.789	.	.	.	.	22.5	7.62
13	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	7	.714	5	1	1	0.33	12	.917	1	0.33	1	1.000	7.5	4.51
16	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	18	6.00	5	28	.464	6	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	20.5	10.00
19	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	19	6.33	0	21	.905	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.47
20	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	12	.667	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.91
23	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	11	.818	4	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.89
24	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	16	.688	3	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.12
27	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	5	17	.176	3	0	4	0.00	13	.692	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.07
28	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	9	.556	5	1	4	0.33	13	.692	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.47
31	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	21	5.25	2	29	.655	6	1	1	0.25	16	.938	.	.	.	.	22.0	7.61
32	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	2	18	.667	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	1	0.33	1	1.000	16.0	6.23
36	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	21	.381	3	2	4	0.50	14	.714	0	0.00	2	.000	16.0	7.62
37	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	13	.769	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.32
41	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	6	28	.357	9	2	1	0.40	19	.947	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.04
42	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	1	18	.778	14	1	0	0.20	26	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.0	4.95
44	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	22	4.40	2	25	.800	7	1	2	0.20	19	.895	.	.	.	.	24.5	7.09
46	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	15	.733	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.13
47	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	4	24	.542	9	2	3	0.40	21	.857	.	.	.	.	19.5	6.40
Total		90	340	3.78	64	484	.570	114	20	43	0.22	336	.872	3	0.03	8	.375	393.0	6.94

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	14	2.30	23	1	.957	19.5	7.81
3	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	8	2.67	10	2.47	15	0	1.000	15.5	9.54
4	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	23	2.25	40	4	.900	16.5	6.96
5	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	2	0.67	7	2.06	16	1	.938	15.5	7.28
8	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	4	1.33	14	2.63	19	0	1.000	12.5	8.25
9	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	10	2.00	18	4	.778	16.5	7.99
11	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	16	2.28	29	3	.897	13.0	7.25
12	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	5	1.00	27	2.20	50	4	.920	22.5	7.62
13	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	5	1.67	11	2.11	18	3	.833	7.5	4.51
16	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	9	2.90	10	0	1.000	20.5	10.00
19	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	6	2.33	12	0	1.000	21.0	8.47
20	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	1.75	16	3	.813	9.0	4.91
23	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	13	2.50	20	1	.950	11.5	6.89
24	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	15	2.42	26	0	1.000	14.0	8.12
27	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	21	2.08	40	6	.850	10.5	4.07
28	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	2	0.67	8	2.06	17	3	.824	9.0	4.47
31	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	16	2.10	31	3	.903	22.0	7.61
32	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	4	1.79	14	1	.929	16.0	6.23
36	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	15	2.55	22	1	.955	16.0	7.62
37	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.06	18	1	.944	11.0	5.32
41	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	18	1.95	44	6	.864	19.0	6.04
42	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	8	1.60	30	7	.767	17.0	4.95
44	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	2	0.40	19	1.95	40	7	.825	24.5	7.09
46	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	14	2.39	23	2	.913	13.5	8.13
47	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	3	0.60	18	2.14	37	1	.973	19.5	6.40
Total		90	1	64	65	5	0.72	76	0.84	329	2.16	628	62	.901	393.0	6.94