Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 6 hours and 26 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 11:33:11 AM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Bill Lumbergh 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	17	-	-	17	14

Season 11 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
94 62nd	2.06 150th	.917 106th	53 106th	9 256th

Career Honors

S122nd All-BIG-8

S132nd All-BIG-8

S141st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	10	.500	0.0	5.45
3	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	15	.733	0.0	7.38
8	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	0.0	6.43
11	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	1	.000	0.0	2.35
14	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	4	0	1.33	16	1.000	2	0.67	4	.500	4.0	4.88
15	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	1	0.67	16	.938	6	2.00	7	.857	2.0	6.72
17	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	3	0.00	14	.786	3	0.75	5	.600	0.0	3.43
18	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	11	.909	0	0.00	1	.000	0.0	1.78
21	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	14	.929	1	0.25	2	.500	0.0	5.40
25	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	4	1.33	8	.500	1.0	4.51
26	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	3	0.00	14	.786	7	1.40	8	.875	0.0	5.30
29	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	1	2	0.33	15	.867	2	0.67	9	.222	1.0	10.00
34	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.25	13	.846	6	1.50	10	.600	1.0	5.76
41	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	2	0.00	16	.875	6	2.00	8	.750	0.0	8.97
Total		50	.	.	.	.	.	61	9	17	0.18	147	.884	53	1.06	88	.602	9.0	5.60

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	15	2.09	35	2	.943	0.0	5.45
3	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	13	2.43	23	0	1.000	0.0	7.38
8	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	9	2.25	16	1	.938	0.0	6.43
11	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	10	1.73	30	5	.833	0.0	2.35
14	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	2.03	29	2	.931	4.0	4.88
15	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	2.33	18	0	1.000	2.0	6.72
17	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	8	1.82	22	2	.909	0.0	3.43
18	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	1.64	25	7	.720	0.0	1.78
21	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	15	2.08	36	3	.917	0.0	5.40
25	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	1.87	15	2	.867	1.0	4.51
26	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	15	2.14	28	2	.929	0.0	5.30
29	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	8	2.67	12	0	1.000	1.0	10.00
34	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	10	2.05	22	1	.955	1.0	5.76
41	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	7	2.29	14	0	1.000	0.0	8.97
Total		50	.	.	.	.	.	94	1.88	144	2.06	325	27	.917	9.0	5.60