Players

Diego Scilacci 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	16	17	17	16	9

Career Honors

S132nd All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	9	.333	4	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.58
2	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	14	.500	5	1	1	0.25	10	.900	.	.	.	.	11.5	3.98
5	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	5	.000	8	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.64
8	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	9	21	-.048	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.90
10	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	13	.615	4	2	3	0.67	9	.667	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.95
12	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	1	27	.481	5	1	1	0.20	15	.933	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.60
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	10	.200	7	1	2	0.33	15	.867	1	0.33	1	1.000	6.0	3.00
14	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	13	-.154	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.19
18	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	7	23	.087	5	1	2	0.20	17	.882	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.57
19	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	15	.333	11	2	5	0.50	22	.773	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.58
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	20	.150	3	1	1	0.33	10	.900	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.0	4.42
26	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	15	.267	0	0	3	0.00	7	.571	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.69
31	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	18	.333	9	3	2	0.60	20	.900	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.16
34	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	0	12	.833	8	2	2	0.67	13	.846	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.04
36	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	16	.250	4	1	3	0.33	12	.750	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.49
39	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	15	.400	4	1	2	0.25	14	.857	1	0.25	1	1.000	10.5	4.56
41	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	20	.500	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.84
44	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	5	13	.000	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	1	0.25	1	1.000	7.0	2.78
46	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	1	12	.667	6	1	3	0.20	16	.813	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.76
Total		69	145	2.10	57	291	.302	95	19	40	0.28	242	.835	4	0.06	4	1.000	184.5	4.88

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	8	1.85	20	2	.900	7.5	3.58
2	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	3	0.75	7	1.94	18	1	.944	11.5	3.98
5	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	7	2.00	18	2	.889	3.0	4.64
8	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	2.41	17	0	1.000	8.0	5.90
10	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	8	2.31	13	2	.846	12.5	6.95
12	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	9	1.80	7	2.33	15	0	1.000	16.5	6.60
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	5	1.57	14	3	.786	6.0	3.00
14	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	.	.	16	2.34	32	1	.969	4.5	4.19
18	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	10	2.00	18	2.19	37	2	.946	11.0	4.57
19	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	12	1.88	26	6	.769	10.0	3.58
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	3	1.90	10	0	1.000	9.0	4.42
26	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	1.81	16	1	.938	8.0	3.69
31	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	13	2.60	16	2.31	26	2	.923	12.5	5.16
34	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	4	1.83	18	2	.889	12.0	6.04
36	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	13	2.25	24	2	.917	10.0	6.49
39	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	16	2.25	32	1	.969	10.5	4.56
41	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	2	0.67	8	2.24	17	0	1.000	13.5	7.84
44	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	10	1.78	23	6	.739	7.0	2.78
46	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	7	1.40	15	2.18	28	2	.929	11.5	4.76
Total		69	1	39	40	6	0.58	90	1.30	189	2.10	404	35	.913	184.5	4.88