Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	3.95
7	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	5.98
13	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	9.43
14	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	3.95
15	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	8.94
16	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	3.90
17	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	2.93
18	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.98
21	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	5.75
23	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	7.76
25	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.81
26	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	8.67
Total		47	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.25

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	NA	NA	32	8	.750	0.0	3.95
7	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	NA	NA	14	1	.929	0.0	5.98
13	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.75	NA	NA	17	0	1.000	1.0	9.43
14	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	NA	NA	29	5	.828	0.0	3.95
15	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	NA	NA	13	0	1.000	0.0	8.94
16	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	NA	NA	17	2	.882	0.0	3.90
17	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	NA	NA	10	1	.900	0.0	2.93
18	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	NA	NA	22	1	.955	3.0	6.98
21	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	NA	NA	25	2	.920	0.0	5.75
23	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	NA	NA	33	1	.970	0.0	7.76
25	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	NA	NA	16	0	1.000	2.0	6.81
26	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3.50	NA	NA	19	1	.947	1.0	8.67
Total		47	.	.	.	.	.	117	2.49	0	0.00	247	22	.911	7.0	6.25