Players

Julius Hibbert 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	17	17	17	16	7

Career Honors

S132nd All-SEC

S142nd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

S153rd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	10	26	-.115	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.76
2	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	20	4.00	7	38	.342	7	0	2	0.00	20	.900	1	0.20	1	1.000	22.0	7.11
3	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	26	.192	3	0	4	0.00	11	.636	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.45
5	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	10	.100	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.44
6	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	26	.154	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.73
8	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	9	.444	4	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.41
9	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	7	24	.125	1	1	2	0.33	7	.714	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.97
10	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	4	20	.600	4	1	3	0.33	13	.769	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.35
11	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	2	19	.632	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.93
13	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	19	4.75	8	35	.314	3	1	3	0.25	15	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	20.5	7.68
15	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	20	5.00	2	35	.514	10	2	3	0.50	20	.850	.	.	.	.	23.0	8.48
17	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	6	28	.393	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.24
18	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	21	4.20	8	32	.406	4	0	2	0.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	23.0	8.24
21	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	9	.667	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	8.5	3.88
22	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	4	14	-.071	7	0	3	0.00	17	.824	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.70
25	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	21	.238	6	1	3	0.25	14	.786	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.74
26	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	7	20	.150	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	6.79
29	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	7	23	.043	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	9.0	6.98
34	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	8	31	.129	4	3	1	0.75	13	.923	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.43
Total		69	220	3.19	98	446	.274	65	9	36	0.13	217	.834	1	0.01	5	.200	251.5	5.96

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	11	2.18	22	2	.909	7.5	4.76
2	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	5	1.00	12	1.94	33	3	.909	22.0	7.11
3	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	12	2.28	25	0	1.000	10.0	6.45
5	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	14	1.87	30	7	.767	5.0	2.44
6	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	2.04	26	4	.846	9.0	4.73
8	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	7	2.38	13	0	1.000	6.0	4.41
9	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	14	2.15	27	2	.926	11.5	5.97
10	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	9	1.95	21	3	.857	17.5	7.35
11	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	14	2.40	25	1	.960	15.0	6.93
13	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	8	2.00	15	2.09	33	3	.909	20.5	7.68
15	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	4	1.00	15	2.16	32	1	.969	23.0	8.48
17	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	21	2.33	36	2	.944	17.0	7.24
18	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	10	2.00	18	2.26	35	2	.943	23.0	8.24
21	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	7	1.88	16	2	.875	8.5	3.88
22	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	2	1.20	4	0.80	14	1.91	33	5	.848	6.0	3.70
25	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	8	1.77	30	3	.900	13.0	4.74
26	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	17	2.25	28	3	.893	13.0	6.79
29	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	17	2.61	23	0	1.000	9.0	6.98
34	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	19	2.03	37	6	.838	15.0	5.43
Total		69	1	43	44	8	0.64	71	1.03	255	2.12	525	49	.907	251.5	5.96