Players

Julius Hibbert 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	17	17	17	16	7

Season 14 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
380 3rd	.592 17th	47 2nd	108 39th	71 37th

Career Honors

S132nd All-SEC

S142nd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

S153rd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	17	.235	19	4	0	1.33	25	1.000	2	0.67	2	1.000	11.5	7.27
3	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	2	28	.464	12	2	1	0.50	23	.957	0	0.00	1	.000	19.0	9.14
4	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	8	1.000	10	2	0	0.67	16	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	12.0	7.56
5	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	2	22	.591	16	1	1	0.25	24	.958	.	.	.	.	20.0	8.01
7	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	27	5.40	1	31	.839	5	1	2	0.20	15	.867	.	.	.	.	28.5	8.13
9	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	4	18	.389	4	1	2	0.25	15	.867	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.48
10	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	0	14	1.000	11	3	1	1.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	18.5	8.35
12	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	16	.813	10	3	3	1.00	18	.833	.	.	.	.	19.0	9.71
14	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	16	.438	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.80
16	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	5	25	.360	3	1	1	0.25	14	.929	0	0.00	1	.000	17.5	7.61
17	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	4	30	.500	17	6	3	1.20	31	.903	1	0.20	2	.500	27.0	9.03
19	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	20	6.67	1	23	.826	11	1	0	0.33	16	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	23.0	9.29
21	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	18	.500	10	3	3	0.75	19	.842	2	0.50	2	1.000	15.5	7.58
23	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	0	17	.882	5	1	4	0.33	10	.600	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.57
25	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	15	.400	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	2	0.67	2	1.000	10.0	7.42
27	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	23	5.75	2	29	.724	9	3	2	0.75	21	.905	1	0.25	1	1.000	28.0	9.13
31	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	23	5.75	2	34	.618	7	3	1	0.75	16	.938	1	0.25	2	.500	26.5	8.57
32	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	15	.533	3	1	3	0.33	9	.667	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.22
34	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	13	.462	8	3	1	1.00	14	.929	1	0.33	1	1.000	15.0	8.25
37	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	25	5.00	3	33	.667	0	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	25.0	7.18
39	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	19	.579	9	1	1	0.25	19	.947	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.36
41	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	3	20	.600	6	3	1	1.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.74
42	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	15	5.00	4	19	.579	1	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.05
44	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	23	4.60	6	36	.472	4	2	4	0.40	16	.750	1	0.20	1	1.000	26.0	7.31
46	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	3	23	.522	5	2	0	0.50	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	19.5	6.00
Total		92	380	4.13	61	539	.592	193	47	41	0.51	405	.899	12	0.13	17	.706	464.5	7.87

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	10	3.33	8	2.67	12	0	1.000	11.5	7.27
3	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	11	2.75	12	2.41	22	0	1.000	19.0	9.14
4	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	8	2.33	15	0	1.000	12.0	7.56
5	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	0	2.00	4	1.00	10	2.00	23	3	.870	20.0	8.01
7	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	3	0.60	18	2.38	29	2	.931	28.5	8.13
9	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	8	2.38	13	1	.923	14.5	6.48
10	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	2	2.00	8	0	1.000	18.5	8.35
12	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	7	2.70	10	0	1.000	19.0	9.71
14	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	10	3.33	5	2.09	11	1	.909	10.5	6.80
16	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	20	2.52	29	1	.966	17.5	7.61
17	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	9	1.80	12	2.41	22	0	1.000	27.0	9.03
19	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	10	2.30	20	0	1.000	23.0	9.29
21	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	15	2.52	21	1	.952	15.5	7.58
23	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	2.55	11	0	1.000	16.0	8.57
25	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	13	2.56	18	1	.944	10.0	7.42
27	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	4	1.00	13	2.30	30	0	1.000	28.0	9.13
31	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	25	2.51	37	2	.946	26.5	8.57
32	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	7	2.20	15	1	.933	13.0	7.22
34	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	3	1.00	6	2.56	9	0	1.000	15.0	8.25
37	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	19	2.32	38	1	.974	25.0	7.18
39	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	8	2.24	17	0	1.000	15.5	7.36
41	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	11	2.04	24	3	.875	18.5	7.74
42	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	14	2.19	27	2	.926	15.0	7.05
44	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	21	2.12	42	7	.833	26.0	7.31
46	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	7	1.80	20	1	.950	19.5	6.00
Total		92	4	67	71	2	0.77	108	1.17	286	2.31	523	27	.948	464.5	7.87