Players

Atticus Whaley 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	19	15	16	17	12

Season 15 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
275 36th	.508 49th	29 50th	67 158th	48 140th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 15)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	3	20	.550	8	6	1	2.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	21.5	9.79
2	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	17	.412	7	1	1	0.33	14	.929	1	0.33	1	1.000	12.5	8.48
5	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	18	.500	9	2	1	0.67	18	.944	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.39
6	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	23	.391	8	4	2	1.00	19	.895	0	0.00	1	.000	19.0	8.62
10	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	7	.429	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.29
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	16	.813	2	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.28
13	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	11	.545	9	3	2	1.00	16	.875	1	0.33	1	1.000	12.0	6.87
16	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	25	5.00	4	31	.677	5	0	1	0.00	21	.952	.	.	.	.	27.0	8.52
19	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	14	.143	7	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.23
20	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	4	22	.500	2	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.55
23	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	2	28	.643	6	1	1	0.20	19	.947	1	0.20	2	.500	23.0	8.35
24	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	16	.563	10	0	1	0.00	24	.958	1	0.25	1	1.000	11.5	7.28
26	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	5	31	.355	6	3	2	0.75	17	.882	0	0.00	1	.000	20.5	9.06
27	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	5	24	.417	2	0	4	0.00	14	.714	1	0.25	1	1.000	15.0	6.52
29	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	13	.692	11	3	0	1.00	17	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	14.0	8.03
32	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	18	.389	14	1	3	0.25	24	.875	1	0.25	1	1.000	12.0	6.93
36	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	4	22	.500	2	1	3	0.20	15	.800	2	0.40	2	1.000	18.0	6.96
37	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	1	18	.667	4	0	3	0.00	17	.824	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.84
41	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	16	.625	8	0	4	0.00	16	.750	.	.	.	.	12.5	9.14
42	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	4	26	.577	3	1	4	0.20	18	.778	1	0.20	1	1.000	21.0	6.99
46	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	8	22	.273	5	1	0	0.25	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.95
Total		78	275	3.53	65	413	.508	132	29	41	0.37	351	.883	10	0.13	13	.769	329.0	7.67

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 15)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	7	2.60	10	0	1.000	21.5	9.79
2	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	12	2.73	15	0	1.000	12.5	8.48
5	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	9	2.38	16	0	1.000	14.5	8.39
6	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	8	2.00	12	2.63	16	0	1.000	19.0	8.62
10	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	4	2.44	9	0	1.000	4.5	4.29
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	12	2.86	14	0	1.000	15.5	8.28
13	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	13	2.71	17	0	1.000	12.0	6.87
16	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	22	2.45	33	1	.970	27.0	8.52
19	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	10	2.57	14	0	1.000	8.5	6.23
20	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	2.38	8	0	1.000	16.0	7.55
23	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	16	2.75	20	0	1.000	23.0	8.35
24	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	16	2.61	23	0	1.000	11.5	7.28
26	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	16	2.54	24	1	.958	20.5	9.06
27	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	9	2.28	18	1	.944	15.0	6.52
29	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	6	2.50	8	0	1.000	14.0	8.03
32	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	8	2.50	12	0	1.000	12.0	6.93
36	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	15	2.79	19	0	1.000	18.0	6.96
37	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	13	2.72	18	0	1.000	15.5	7.84
41	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	4	1.33	10	2.83	12	0	1.000	12.5	9.14
42	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	11	2.39	18	1	.944	21.0	6.99
46	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	14	2.48	21	1	.952	15.0	6.95
Total		78	2	46	48	3	0.62	67	0.86	240	2.58	345	5	.986	329.0	7.67