Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	11	.455	0.0	10.00
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	.333	0.0	4.95
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	11	.545	0.0	7.59
4	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	3.73
7	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	9	.778	0.0	3.70
10	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	5	.400	0.0	4.80
13	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	3	0.00	8	.625	6	2.00	6	1.000	0.0	9.77
15	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	0	0.00	3	.000	1.0	4.08
17	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	2	2	0.67	18	.889	4	1.33	7	.571	2.0	9.83
18	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	4	0.00	15	.733	3	0.75	9	.333	0.0	10.00
21	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	6.18
22	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	4	1.000	2	0.67	9	.222	0.0	4.40
25	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	3.05
26	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	6.53
29	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	5	.800	0.0	7.94
34	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	1	0.50	14	.929	2	0.50	5	.400	2.0	8.96
41	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	4.13
Total		59	.	.	.	.	.	35	5	14	0.08	80	.825	61	1.03	110	.555	5.0	6.45

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	4.00	8	2.70	10	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	2.29	17	0	1.000	0.0	4.95
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	9	2.36	14	1	.929	0.0	7.59
4	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	1.80	15	3	.800	0.0	3.73
7	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	22	2.29	38	2	.947	0.0	3.70
10	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	9	2.24	17	2	.882	0.0	4.80
13	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	16	5.33	6	2.36	11	1	.909	0.0	9.77
15	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	1.85	13	2	.846	1.0	4.08
17	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	8	2.47	15	0	1.000	2.0	9.83
18	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	18	4.50	20	2.56	27	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
21	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	2.07	14	3	.786	0.0	6.18
22	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	1.92	12	3	.750	0.0	4.40
25	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	1.62	26	7	.731	0.0	3.05
26	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	13	2.35	20	2	.900	0.0	6.53
29	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	25	2.58	36	0	1.000	0.0	7.94
34	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	13	2.50	20	0	1.000	2.0	8.96
41	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	2.21	14	1	.929	0.0	4.13
Total		59	.	.	.	.	.	135	2.29	183	2.26	319	27	.915	5.0	6.45