Players

Federico Oramas 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	16	16	17	17	11

Season 15 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
361 5th	.458 100th	39 10th	90 67th	59 81st

Career Honors

S161st All-TMVL1st All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 15)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	25	.280	3	0	4	0.00	10	.600	1	0.33	2	.500	12.0	6.52
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	9	29	.138	5	1	3	0.33	12	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	15.5	8.25
4	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	18	.611	8	2	0	0.67	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.40
6	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	13	.385	6	1	1	0.25	15	.933	1	0.25	1	1.000	10.5	3.92
7	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	22	4.40	5	34	.500	1	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	24.0	6.85
8	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	9	30	.233	6	2	3	0.40	15	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	18.5	5.52
10	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	0	15	.800	10	2	2	0.50	19	.895	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.21
11	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	20	.350	8	2	3	0.67	16	.813	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.76
13	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	1	19	.789	6	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.91
16	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	17	5.67	8	28	.321	7	2	2	0.67	16	.875	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.63
19	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	16	.438	12	6	1	2.00	19	.947	1	0.33	1	1.000	17.0	8.38
20	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	4	25	.480	5	2	2	0.67	14	.857	.	.	.	.	18.5	8.06
23	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	4	21	.476	3	1	3	0.25	13	.769	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.11
24	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	6	27	.370	4	1	4	0.25	15	.733	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.80
25	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	1	17	.706	3	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.00
26	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	23	.261	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	11.0	5.95
29	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	4	26	.462	10	3	2	0.60	20	.900	.	.	.	.	22.0	8.25
32	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	4	23	.609	5	2	3	0.50	15	.800	1	0.25	1	1.000	22.0	8.78
34	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	1	22	.727	13	1	1	0.25	22	.955	.	.	.	.	20.0	8.84
36	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	10	.600	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.16
37	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	22	.455	6	3	1	0.75	18	.944	1	0.25	1	1.000	16.5	6.59
39	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	9	.333	9	1	2	0.33	16	.875	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.45
42	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	2	25	.680	6	1	1	0.20	20	.950	.	.	.	.	23.0	7.48
44	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	19	.316	2	2	0	0.67	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.47
46	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	5	25	.440	6	1	1	0.25	19	.947	.	.	.	.	18.5	8.42
47	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	21	4.20	5	31	.516	3	1	1	0.20	17	.941	1	0.20	2	.500	22.5	7.17
Total		96	361	3.76	99	572	.458	152	39	48	0.41	383	.875	6	0.06	11	.545	431.0	7.03

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 15)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.05	22	1	.955	12.0	6.52
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	9	2.19	16	1	.938	15.5	8.25
4	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	3	2.20	5	1	.800	15.5	8.40
6	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	3	0.75	12	1.97	30	5	.833	10.5	3.92
7	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	20	2.04	45	4	.911	24.0	6.85
8	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	13	1.94	31	6	.806	18.5	5.52
10	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	9	2.25	7	2.11	19	1	.947	15.5	7.21
11	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	9	1.87	23	3	.870	14.0	6.76
13	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	7	2.14	14	0	1.000	19.0	8.91
16	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	2.33	18	0	1.000	19.0	8.63
19	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	4	1.33	10	2.47	17	0	1.000	17.0	8.38
20	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	11	2.16	25	2	.920	18.5	8.06
23	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16	2.28	29	2	.931	15.0	6.11
24	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	.	.	22	2.41	37	0	1.000	18.5	7.80
25	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	2.00	16	1	.938	14.0	7.00
26	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.24	17	2	.882	11.0	5.95
29	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	7	1.40	22	2.53	30	1	.967	22.0	8.25
32	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	6	1.50	16	2.40	25	0	1.000	22.0	8.78
34	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0	2	1	0.50	7	1.75	12	2.30	20	1	.950	20.0	8.84
36	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	14	2.04	26	6	.769	7.5	4.16
37	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	18	2.19	36	2	.944	16.5	6.59
39	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	6	1.81	16	3	.813	7.5	3.45
42	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	3	0.60	19	2.13	38	5	.868	23.0	7.48
44	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	14	1.76	41	6	.854	14.0	5.47
46	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	1	0.50	11	2.75	15	2.26	31	1	.968	18.5	8.42
47	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	1	0.20	21	2.35	37	0	1.000	22.5	7.17
Total		96	3	56	59	7	0.61	90	0.94	329	2.16	664	54	.919	431.0	7.03