Players

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 08:09:01 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Gustavo Peralta Senior Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	18	-	-	14	12

Season 14 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
56 218th	2.33 30th	.964 15th	28 132nd	5 317th

Career Honors

S163rd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	3	1.00	13	.231	1.0	4.00
4	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	1	0.33	10	.100	0.0	3.50
9	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	6.65
11	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	2	0.67	4	.500	1.0	5.18
14	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	5	.800	0	0.00	3	.000	0.0	3.35
15	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	4	0.33	11	.636	2	0.67	5	.400	1.0	7.58
17	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	7.25
18	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.20	15	.867	6	1.20	13	.462	1.0	6.38
21	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	4.30
23	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	2.50
32	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	2	0.33	7	.714	3	1.00	4	.750	1.0	6.18
39	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	4	1.000	0.0	7.95
41	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	5	.400	0.0	5.65
Total		43	.	.	.	.	.	23	5	16	0.12	80	.800	28	0.65	80	.350	5.0	5.42

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	2.00	16	0	1.000	1.0	4.00
4	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	8	2.21	14	1	.929	0.0	3.50
9	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	2.36	14	1	.929	0.0	6.65
11	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.43	14	0	1.000	1.0	5.18
14	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.20	15	1	.933	0.0	3.35
15	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	5	2.30	10	0	1.000	1.0	7.58
17	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	10	2.44	16	0	1.000	0.0	7.25
18	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	15	2.45	22	0	1.000	1.0	6.38
21	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	2.30	10	0	1.000	0.0	4.30
23	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	1.93	15	2	.867	0.0	2.50
32	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	15	2.70	20	0	1.000	1.0	6.18
39	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	14	2.68	19	0	1.000	0.0	7.95
41	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	21	2.23	39	3	.923	0.0	5.65
Total		43	.	.	.	.	.	56	1.30	131	2.33	224	8	.964	5.0	5.42