Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	6	.333	4	2	1	0.50	15	.933	39	9.75	99	.394	6.5	5.91
6	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	12	1	4	0.25	23	.826	39	9.75	94	.415	1.5	5.69
9	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	5	.600	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	34	11.33	73	.466	5.0	7.61
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	2	.000	16	1	1	0.33	23	.957	36	12.00	60	.600	4.0	9.29
15	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	7	2	3	0.67	16	.813	38	12.67	67	.567	3.0	8.40
17	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	6	.000	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	27	9.00	54	.500	1.5	4.48
21	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	17	2	2	0.67	23	.913	39	13.00	55	.709	3.5	9.45
26	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	2	0	5	0.00	15	.667	57	11.40	103	.553	0.5	5.66
30	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	7	2	3	0.67	15	.800	35	11.67	56	.625	4.5	7.94
40	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	10	1	3	0.33	18	.833	38	12.67	62	.613	3.0	9.31
45	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	5	.400	8	2	0	0.50	21	1.000	58	14.50	88	.659	5.0	9.64
Total		38	13	0.34	6	42	.167	89	14	25	0.37	191	.869	440	11.58	811	.543	38.0	7.58

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.91
6	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	14	3.50	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.69
9	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.61
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.29
15	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.40
17	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.48
21	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.45
26	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	5.66
30	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.94
40	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	9.31
45	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	9.64
Total		38	0	22	22	3	0.58	69	1.82	.	.	.	.	.	38.0	7.58