Players

Santiago Landry 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	-	14	13	11	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	8	.000	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.26
4	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	16	.250	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.05
6	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	2	11	.182	9	1	2	0.20	18	.889	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.72
10	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	13	.154	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.52
11	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	16	.063	8	2	3	0.50	16	.813	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.53
13	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	12	.250	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.25
16	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	9	.222	4	2	3	0.67	11	.727	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.15
19	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	3	9	-.333	7	2	1	0.67	13	.923	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.51
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	23	.304	8	1	2	0.20	21	.905	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.87
24	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	8	-.250	0	0	1	0.00	4	.750	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.00
25	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	10	.000	3	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.68
32	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	7	18	-.056	5	1	4	0.25	13	.692	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.49
33	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	5	18	.000	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.60
36	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	10	.500	2	1	1	0.33	5	.800	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.07
38	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	0	13	.462	1	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.70
41	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	9	-.222	5	2	0	0.67	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.16
43	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	5	-.200	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.21
Total		61	75	1.23	52	208	.111	66	13	32	0.21	183	.825	.	.	.	.	120.0	5.22

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.26
4	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.05
6	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.72
10	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.52
11	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.53
13	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	1	7	8	0	2.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.25
16	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.15
19	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.51
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	1	5	6	1	1.20	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.87
24	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.00
25	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.68
32	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.49
33	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	2	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.60
36	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.07
38	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.70
41	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.16
43	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.21
Total		61	8	48	56	6	0.92	22	0.36	.	.	.	.	.	120.0	5.22