Players

Noah Thomas 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	-	15	15	9	-

Season 3 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
140 78th	.340 38th	20 41st	34 173rd	90 1st

Career Honors

S52nd All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 3)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	8	.000	3	1	3	0.25	10	.700	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.19
2	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	0	11	.545	5	1	6	0.20	15	.600	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.18
5	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	17	.471	9	2	2	0.40	18	.889	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.65
6	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	11	.545	2	1	5	0.25	11	.545	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.27
7	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	5	16	.250	13	2	2	0.50	25	.920	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.72
8	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	5	.000	13	2	1	0.67	20	.950	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.67
10	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	3	9	.111	1	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.03
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	7	-.143	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.11
13	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	20	.200	3	1	3	0.25	12	.750	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.99
16	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	7	.571	4	1	3	0.25	12	.750	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.08
17	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	7	-.143	6	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.40
20	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	4	22	.455	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.81
21	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	2	16	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.06
22	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	11	.545	2	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.36
24	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	13	.692	1	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.97
25	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	2	16	.750	7	1	2	0.20	17	.882	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.73
28	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	8	.250	8	3	1	1.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.68
32	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	15	.200	2	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.66
34	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	11	.182	2	2	0	0.67	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.43
36	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	11	.182	4	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.14
41	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	7	.000	7	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.88
43	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	2	20	.500	5	2	3	0.40	13	.769	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.45
Total		88	140	1.59	49	268	.340	97	20	43	0.23	262	.836	.	.	.	.	211.5	5.88

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 3)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	1	6	7	0	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.19
2	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	9	9	1	1.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.18
5	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.65
6	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.27
7	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.72
8	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.67
10	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.03
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.11
13	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	1	2.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.99
16	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.08
17	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.40
20	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	1	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.81
21	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	2	4	6	0	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.06
22	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.36
24	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.97
25	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.73
28	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.68
32	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.66
34	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.43
36	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	3	3	6	0	1.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.14
41	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.88
43	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	4	3	7	1	1.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.45
Total		88	13	77	90	7	1.02	34	0.39	.	.	.	.	.	211.5	5.88