Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	6	1	1	0.33	13	.923	19	6.33	73	.260	1.5	2.64
4	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	4	1	1	0.33	11	.909	26	8.67	67	.388	3.0	4.46
5	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	5	3	3	1.00	12	.750	10	3.33	64	.156	4.5	3.34
8	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	6	.333	5	1	3	0.25	15	.800	31	7.75	83	.373	5.0	4.12
12	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	9	2	1	0.67	17	.941	21	7.00	77	.273	4.5	4.95
13	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	5	1	2	0.33	14	.857	23	7.67	82	.280	3.0	4.04
16	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	6	1	1	0.33	13	.923	21	7.00	69	.304	1.0	2.78
19	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	17	5.67	69	.246	0.0	1.08
22	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	18	6.00	72	.250	0.0	1.40
24	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	3	.000	6	3	4	0.60	19	.789	39	7.80	116	.336	4.5	3.60
25	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	4	3	1	1.00	12	.917	21	7.00	72	.292	6.0	3.78
Total		36	10	0.28	2	32	.250	51	16	19	0.44	140	.864	246	6.83	844	.291	33.0	3.29

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.64
4	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.46
5	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.34
8	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.12
12	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.95
13	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.04
16	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.78
19	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.08
22	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.40
24	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.60
25	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.78
Total		36	2	10	12	1	0.33	28	0.78	.	.	.	.	.	33.0	3.29