Players

Derek Smalls 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	16	17	17	16	8

Season 5 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
367 4th	.621 3rd	33 18th	125 52nd	76 44th

Career Honors

S42nd All-BIG-8

S51st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

S62nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	18	6.00	2	23	.696	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.46
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	0	20	.550	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	0	0.00	1	.000	11.5	7.97
4	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	5	31	.452	6	0	4	0.00	19	.789	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.55
5	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	28	5.60	8	45	.444	5	0	4	0.00	21	.810	0	0.00	1	.000	28.5	6.50
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	15	.467	7	1	2	0.33	15	.867	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.29
8	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	15	.400	5	1	1	0.33	14	.929	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.05
10	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	1	17	.824	3	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.06
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	9	.667	3	2	1	0.67	8	.875	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.71
13	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	23	7.67	1	28	.786	10	3	2	1.00	17	.882	0	0.00	1	.000	28.0	9.49
16	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	29	5.80	2	32	.844	8	4	1	0.80	21	.952	1	0.20	1	1.000	35.5	9.11
19	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	11	.727	12	4	0	1.33	19	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.39
20	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	18	4.50	2	26	.615	6	0	1	0.00	17	.941	0	0.00	1	.000	19.5	8.32
22	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	17	.647	3	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.57
23	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	10	.900	7	4	2	1.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.42
26	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	19	.526	3	2	0	0.50	13	1.000	2	0.50	1	2.000	18.5	7.60
27	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	1	18	.611	4	0	2	0.00	16	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	7.16
30	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	5	24	.458	6	0	2	0.00	18	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	19.0	7.68
32	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	1	14	.857	7	0	2	0.00	16	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	14.0	9.08
35	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	3	24	.542	8	1	3	0.25	20	.850	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.61
37	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	3	19	.632	4	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.0	9.27
40	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	22	.455	13	3	2	1.00	20	.900	.	.	.	.	17.5	9.81
42	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	3	20	.600	3	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.23
44	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	2	19	.789	5	2	1	0.50	18	.944	0	0.00	1	.000	20.0	7.97
45	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	0	11	1.000	7	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.87
47	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	12	.583	10	5	1	1.67	17	.941	0	0.00	1	.000	16.0	8.66
Total		90	367	4.08	56	501	.621	147	33	40	0.37	385	.896	6	0.07	11	.545	439.0	8.11

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	9	2.35	17	0	1.000	19.0	8.46
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	17	5.67	8	2.47	15	0	1.000	11.5	7.97
4	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	10	2.00	12	2.42	19	1	.947	21.0	8.55
5	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	3	0.60	16	1.78	40	6	.850	28.5	6.50
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	7	2.45	11	1	.909	11.0	7.29
8	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	1	1.00	.	.	7	3.00	7	0	1.000	13.0	8.05
10	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	9	2.73	11	0	1.000	17.0	8.06
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	3	2.29	7	0	1.000	10.5	5.71
13	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	7	2.31	13	0	1.000	28.0	9.49
16	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	8	1.60	7	2.25	16	0	1.000	35.5	9.11
19	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	5	2.40	10	0	1.000	13.0	7.39
20	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	8	2.00	8	2.13	16	2	.875	19.5	8.32
22	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	9	2.29	17	0	1.000	14.5	8.57
23	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	6	2.25	12	0	1.000	14.0	7.42
26	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	3	0.75	14	2.43	23	1	.957	18.5	7.60
27	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	10	2.57	14	0	1.000	13.5	7.16
30	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	1	1.20	4	0.80	18	2.54	24	1	.958	19.0	7.68
32	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	9	2.46	13	1	.923	14.0	9.08
35	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	10	2.56	16	0	1.000	18.0	8.61
37	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	9	2.62	13	0	1.000	16.0	9.27
40	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	6	2.56	9	0	1.000	17.5	9.81
42	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	6	2.18	11	2	.818	17.0	7.23
44	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	10	2.30	20	0	1.000	20.0	7.97
45	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	8	2.67	7	2.36	11	0	1.000	13.5	8.87
47	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	9	2.80	10	0	1.000	16.0	8.66
Total		90	2	74	76	4	0.84	125	1.39	221	2.36	375	15	.960	439.0	8.11