Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	4	0.25	13	.692	2	0.50	7	.286	1.0	8.67
2	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	0	0.20	12	1.000	1	0.20	13	.077	1.0	9.06
6	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	1	0.00	20	.950	3	0.60	6	.500	0.0	6.10
9	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	4.40
12	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	6.08
13	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	3	0.75	7	.429	0.0	5.68
17	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	3.78
18	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	2	0.25	14	.857	3	0.75	12	.250	1.0	8.40
20	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	2	0.25	16	.875	2	0.50	6	.333	1.0	6.10
22	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	2	0.67	12	.833	2	0.67	6	.333	2.0	7.05
25	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.25	11	.909	0	0.00	4	.000	1.0	7.10
27	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	3	0.00	19	.842	3	0.75	11	.273	0.0	7.33
29	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	2	0.40	20	.900	2	0.40	11	.182	2.0	5.55
32	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	4	0.80	10	.400	0.0	6.05
36	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	3	0.00	17	.824	4	1.00	7	.571	0.0	7.23
41	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	1	2.000	0.0	5.75
Total		63	.	.	.	.	.	79	9	24	0.14	191	.874	37	0.59	111	.333	9.0	6.52

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3.50	17	2.34	29	2	.931	1.0	8.67
2	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	20	2.54	28	2	.929	1.0	9.06
6	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.60	15	2.03	31	3	.903	0.0	6.10
9	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	1.91	22	4	.818	0.0	4.40
12	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	4	1.82	11	2	.818	0.0	6.08
13	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	11	2.00	22	2	.909	0.0	5.68
17	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	14	2.26	23	2	.913	0.0	3.78
18	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	13	2.35	20	1	.950	1.0	8.40
20	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	10	2.18	17	1	.941	1.0	6.10
22	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	6	1.77	13	4	.692	2.0	7.05
25	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	10	2.50	16	0	1.000	1.0	7.10
27	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	16	2.05	37	4	.892	0.0	7.33
29	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	11	2.04	24	2	.917	2.0	5.55
32	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.60	14	2.03	36	4	.889	0.0	6.05
36	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	15	2.27	26	3	.885	0.0	7.23
41	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	17	2.32	28	1	.964	0.0	5.75
Total		63	.	.	.	.	.	161	2.56	202	2.16	383	37	.903	9.0	6.52