Players

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 06:02:38 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Raymond Caldwell 5 Right Side (RS)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	14	16	13	-

Season 4 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
89 118th	.200 127th	5 185th	43 144th	23 164th

Career Honors

S63rd All-TMVL2nd All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 4)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	8	25	.080	12	0	8	0.00	23	.652	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.39
3	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	11	.455	5	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.20
6	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	14	.357	5	0	4	0.00	11	.636	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.71
8	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	10	-.100	3	2	4	0.67	11	.636	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.34
11	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	7	.286	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.20
13	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	6	23	.000	7	2	5	0.50	16	.688	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.39
17	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	13	.231	8	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	8.0	8.90
18	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	26	.346	8	0	2	0.00	18	.889	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.28
20	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	11	.273	8	0	2	0.00	18	.889	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.62
21	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	9	-.222	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.64
32	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	6	27	.111	7	0	0	0.00	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.61
33	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	14	.429	6	1	4	0.33	12	.667	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.38
36	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	15	.400	3	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.06
Total		45	89	1.98	48	205	.200	78	5	38	0.11	183	.792	.	.	.	.	106.5	5.82

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 4)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.39
3	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.20
6	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	2	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.71
8	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.34
11	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.20
13	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.39
17	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	8.90
18	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.28
20	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.62
21	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.64
32	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	2	1	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.61
33	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.38
36	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.06
Total		45	2	21	23	4	0.51	43	0.96	.	.	.	.	.	106.5	5.82