Players

Session 13 orders deadline in 30 hours and 53 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Saturday, May 2nd, 2026 - 11:06:59 AM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Jeremy Payne 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
18	17	-	-	16	13

Season 5 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
118 65th	2.25 53rd	.958 44th	42 101st	16 138th

Career Honors

S71st All-BIG-8

S83rd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
6	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1	2	0.20	19	.895	4	0.80	7	.571	1.0	7.31
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	2	0.00	16	.875	0	0.00	4	.000	0.0	8.80
8	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	2	0.67	13	.846	4	1.33	9	.444	2.0	6.31
11	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	2	0.67	11	.818	2	0.67	8	.250	2.0	9.06
14	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	4	0.40	22	.818	6	1.20	7	.857	2.0	5.83
15	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.33	13	.923	3	1.00	1	3.000	1.0	8.28
17	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	1	0.00	16	.938	6	1.50	8	.750	0.0	8.25
18	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	1	2	0.25	21	.905	4	1.00	2	2.000	1.0	7.02
21	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.33	12	.833	3	1.00	8	.375	1.0	5.28
26	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	4	2	1.00	21	.905	2	0.50	3	.667	4.0	4.81
29	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2	2	0.40	25	.920	2	0.40	11	.182	2.0	7.86
34	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	4	0.00	20	.800	3	0.60	13	.231	0.0	7.23
39	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	3.60
Total		50	.	.	.	.	.	93	16	26	0.32	209	.876	42	0.84	86	.488	16.0	6.90

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
6	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	13	2.15	26	2	.923	1.0	7.31
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	12	2.58	19	0	1.000	0.0	8.80
8	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	11	2.09	23	3	.870	2.0	6.31
11	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	8	2.38	13	0	1.000	2.0	9.06
14	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	12	1.97	35	1	.971	2.0	5.83
15	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	11	2.37	19	0	1.000	1.0	8.28
17	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3.50	5	2.18	11	1	.909	0.0	8.25
18	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	11	2.47	19	0	1.000	1.0	7.02
21	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	2.38	21	0	1.000	1.0	5.28
26	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	11	2.18	22	2	.909	4.0	4.81
29	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	11	2.33	21	1	.952	2.0	7.86
34	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	8	2.22	18	0	1.000	0.0	7.23
39	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	8	2.23	13	1	.923	0.0	3.60
Total		50	.	.	.	.	.	118	2.36	131	2.25	260	11	.958	16.0	6.90