Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 2 hours and 30 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 03:29:12 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Zane Jacobs 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	14	-	-	14	12

Season 5 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
99 96th	2.17 88th	.949 57th	23 123rd	4 359th

Career Honors

S62nd All-BIG-8

S72nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	5.90
4	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	1	0.33	7	.143	0.0	5.20
5	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	2	0.67	8	.250	0.0	5.75
6	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	4	0.25	17	.765	2	0.50	11	.182	1.0	6.78
7	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	0	0.00	4	.000	0.0	4.85
12	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	2	0.50	5	.400	0.0	7.98
13	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	7.36
18	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	5.15
25	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	3.50
26	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	0	4	0.00	17	.765	5	1.25	9	.556	0.0	8.39
30	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	3	4	0.60	19	.789	5	1.00	8	.625	3.0	7.38
33	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	2	0.00	13	.846	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	6.65
Total		41	.	.	.	.	.	48	4	23	0.10	126	.817	23	0.56	74	.311	4.0	6.24

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	7	2.07	14	2	.857	0.0	5.90
4	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	2.05	20	1	.950	0.0	5.20
5	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	11	2.26	23	0	1.000	0.0	5.75
6	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	6	2.00	14	1	.929	1.0	6.78
7	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	2.19	16	1	.938	0.0	4.85
12	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	20	5.00	13	2.00	36	3	.917	0.0	7.98
13	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	12	2.53	17	0	1.000	0.0	7.36
18	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	14	2.15	26	2	.923	0.0	5.15
25	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.05	20	1	.950	0.0	3.50
26	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.75	6	2.20	15	0	1.000	0.0	8.39
30	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	11	2.39	18	0	1.000	3.0	7.38
33	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	10	2.31	16	1	.938	0.0	6.65
Total		41	.	.	.	.	.	99	2.41	115	2.17	235	12	.949	4.0	6.24