Players

Agustin Perez 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	19	16	16	17	8

Season 7 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
266 35th	.360 135th	27 45th	102 64th	69 54th

Career Honors

S82nd All-BIG-8

S91st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 7)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	23	.435	5	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.53
2	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	10	.700	3	0	3	0.00	7	.571	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.80
3	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	19	.421	7	0	3	0.00	16	.813	0	0.00	1	.000	12.0	4.80
4	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	5	23	.435	6	0	0	0.00	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.28
5	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	5	21	.238	3	1	4	0.20	13	.692	0	0.00	2	.000	12.5	4.83
6	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	2	18	.500	10	4	1	0.80	22	.955	1	0.20	1	1.000	16.0	4.97
7	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	7	28	.143	8	0	2	0.00	18	.889	1	0.20	1	1.000	13.0	4.57
8	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	12	.167	4	1	4	0.33	11	.636	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.52
10	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	14	.286	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.75
11	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	5	24	.292	5	2	5	0.50	14	.643	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.60
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	6	10	-.500	1	1	4	0.33	8	.500	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.05
14	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	2	21	.333	3	1	1	0.20	12	.917	1	0.20	2	.500	11.0	2.97
17	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	17	.353	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.43
19	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	7	25	.200	13	3	3	0.60	25	.880	.	.	.	.	15.5	5.82
22	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	12	.417	3	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.5	6.08
23	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	15	.200	5	1	0	0.20	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.69
25	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	9	26	.231	11	2	1	0.50	21	.952	1	0.25	1	1.000	17.5	8.39
27	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	11	.364	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.09
30	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	5	26	.346	10	1	4	0.25	20	.800	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.60
32	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	14	.643	5	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.81
35	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	4	23	.435	4	2	3	0.50	16	.813	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.02
37	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	4	1	4	0.33	12	.667	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.44
39	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	5	22	.409	10	2	2	0.40	23	.913	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.86
40	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	17	.647	3	2	1	0.67	12	.917	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.67
44	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	1	18	.722	3	1	3	0.25	13	.769	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.73
45	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	3	25	.520	3	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.26
Total		102	266	2.61	92	483	.360	136	27	55	0.26	361	.848	7	0.07	9	.778	330.5	5.98

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 7)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	5	2.22	9	0	1.000	14.0	8.53
2	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	6	2.00	12	2	.833	9.5	5.80
3	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	10	2.22	23	2	.913	12.0	4.80
4	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	10	2.50	14	1	.929	16.5	7.28
5	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	8	1.60	15	2.40	25	0	1.000	12.5	4.83
6	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	15	2.33	27	0	1.000	16.0	4.97
7	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	14	2.06	32	2	.938	13.0	4.57
8	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	8	2.23	13	0	1.000	7.0	4.52
10	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	11	2.39	18	1	.944	8.0	5.75
11	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	9	2.25	13	2.40	20	1	.950	16.0	7.60
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	6	2.05	19	0	1.000	3.5	3.05
14	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	15	1.97	35	3	.914	11.0	2.97
17	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	9	2.19	16	2	.875	11.0	6.43
19	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	1	0.20	16	2.57	23	1	.957	15.5	5.82
22	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	7	2.36	14	0	1.000	9.5	6.08
23	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	18	2.23	30	4	.867	8.0	3.69
25	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	10	2.50	10	2.41	17	1	.941	17.5	8.39
27	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	13	2.27	22	2	.909	7.5	4.09
30	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	5	1.25	8	2.11	19	1	.947	17.5	7.60
32	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	13	2.29	21	1	.952	12.5	7.81
35	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0	1	1	0.25	5	1.25	6	2.33	12	0	1.000	17.0	7.02
37	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	11	2.44	18	1	.944	7.5	4.44
39	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	16	2.52	25	0	1.000	16.5	6.86
40	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	8	2.64	11	0	1.000	16.0	8.67
44	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	9	2.11	18	2	.889	18.0	6.73
45	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	12	2.15	20	3	.850	17.5	7.26
Total		102	6	63	69	2	0.68	102	1.00	284	2.27	513	30	.942	330.5	5.98