Players

Agustin Perez 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	19	16	16	17	8

Season 8 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
287 29th	.504 38th	40 11th	86 109th	68 57th

Career Honors

S82nd All-BIG-8

S91st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	18	6.00	3	25	.600	2	2	3	0.67	9	.667	.	.	.	.	22.5	8.99
3	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	16	.563	13	2	1	0.67	21	.952	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.38
4	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	3	22	.636	6	0	3	0.00	17	.824	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.13
6	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	3	25	.400	2	0	3	0.00	15	.800	1	0.20	3	.333	15.0	5.72
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	17	.588	11	3	1	1.00	17	.941	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.79
8	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	3	22	.591	3	2	1	0.50	14	.929	0	0.00	1	.000	21.0	5.97
10	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	6	20	.250	15	4	1	1.33	22	.955	0	0.00	1	.000	15.0	8.42
11	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	17	.529	3	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.28
13	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	18	.500	6	1	3	0.33	14	.786	1	0.33	1	1.000	14.5	9.11
14	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	22	.500	5	1	2	0.25	16	.875	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.79
16	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	17	.529	7	2	4	0.50	17	.765	0	0.00	1	.000	16.0	7.13
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	16	.313	6	2	1	0.67	13	.923	1	0.33	1	1.000	13.0	7.95
20	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	1	28	.643	10	1	5	0.20	24	.792	.	.	.	.	20.5	8.53
23	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	2	24	.625	3	2	2	0.40	15	.867	.	.	.	.	20.0	6.51
24	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	13	.538	8	2	3	0.67	16	.813	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.97
25	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	0	12	.833	5	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.58
27	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	12	.583	4	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.24
28	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	16	.438	5	2	2	0.67	14	.857	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.64
29	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	16	.438	4	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.12
32	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	7	29	.276	5	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.50
34	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	9	.667	4	2	0	0.67	14	1.000	2	0.67	2	1.000	9.5	6.11
37	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	12	.417	6	1	2	0.25	17	.882	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.03
39	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	11	.182	4	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.54
44	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	0	12	.833	15	5	1	1.25	24	.958	1	0.25	1	1.000	16.0	6.24
46	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	17	.294	8	4	1	1.33	15	.933	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.02
Total		88	287	3.26	61	448	.504	160	40	48	0.45	392	.878	6	0.07	11	.545	362.5	7.35

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	5	1.67	11	2.30	20	1	.950	22.5	8.99
3	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	5	2.44	9	0	1.000	13.0	8.38
4	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	13	2.71	17	0	1.000	17.0	8.13
6	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	9	1.80	6	2.25	12	0	1.000	15.0	5.72
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	7	2.55	11	0	1.000	15.5	8.79
8	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	1	0.25	5	1.63	16	3	.813	21.0	5.97
10	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	13	2.50	18	1	.944	15.0	8.42
11	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	2	0.67	8	2.64	11	0	1.000	13.0	8.28
13	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	8	2.45	11	1	.909	14.5	9.11
14	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	6	2.08	13	1	.923	16.5	6.79
16	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	9	2.43	14	0	1.000	16.0	7.13
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	4	1.33	5	2.63	8	0	1.000	13.0	7.95
20	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	20	2.83	24	0	1.000	20.5	8.53
23	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	15	2.45	22	1	.955	20.0	6.51
24	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	12	2.33	18	2	.889	11.5	6.97
25	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	4	1.33	11	2.16	19	3	.842	11.5	7.58
27	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	8	2.64	11	0	1.000	10.5	7.24
28	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	8	2.47	15	0	1.000	13.0	7.64
29	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	5	2.83	6	0	1.000	12.0	8.12
32	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	13	2.30	20	3	.850	17.0	7.50
34	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	12	2.73	15	0	1.000	9.5	6.11
37	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	14	2.56	18	1	.944	9.0	5.03
39	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	2.82	11	0	1.000	6.0	4.54
44	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	8	2.23	13	1	.923	16.0	6.24
46	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	9	2.90	10	0	1.000	14.0	8.02
Total		88	3	65	68	4	0.77	86	0.98	241	2.45	362	18	.950	362.5	7.35