Players

Connor Bennett 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	16	14	14	13	9

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	9	24	-.125	3	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	1	0.25	1	1.000	6.0	3.85
5	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	11	20	-.450	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	3.0	2.66
8	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	14	.357	1	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.98
10	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	15	.000	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	0	0.00	1	.000	4.5	2.92
15	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	6	20	-.150	3	0	3	0.00	10	.700	0	0.00	1	.000	5.0	4.75
17	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	10	.300	8	0	2	0.00	14	.857	1	0.33	1	1.000	5.5	2.82
18	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	15	.533	3	1	3	0.25	11	.727	.	.	.	.	10.5	3.35
21	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	5	17	.000	6	1	6	0.20	14	.571	0	0.00	1	.000	7.0	4.36
25	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	2	11	.091	4	1	2	0.25	11	.818	1	0.25	1	1.000	4.5	2.41
26	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	11	.545	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	1	0.25	1	1.000	8.0	3.20
29	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	12	.083	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	2.0	3.64
40	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	4	18	.222	7	2	1	0.40	17	.941	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.35
45	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	13	.308	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.5	2.96
Total		48	66	1.38	49	200	.085	46	5	23	0.10	136	.831	6	0.13	9	.667	80.0	3.48

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	16	2.21	34	1	.971	6.0	3.85
5	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	10	1.83	23	5	.783	3.0	2.66
8	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	10	2.39	18	0	1.000	6.5	3.98
10	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	9	1.96	26	0	1.000	4.5	2.92
15	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	12	2.45	20	1	.950	5.0	4.75
17	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	2	1.70	10	1	.900	5.5	2.82
18	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	7	1.72	25	4	.840	10.5	3.35
21	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	9	1.80	16	2.24	34	0	1.000	7.0	4.36
25	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	13	1.80	30	7	.767	4.5	2.41
26	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	15	2.07	28	4	.857	8.0	3.20
29	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	2.20	20	1	.950	2.0	3.64
40	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	9	1.80	17	2.20	35	3	.914	11.0	4.35
45	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	9	1.93	27	4	.852	6.5	2.96
Total		48	0	18	18	2	0.38	59	1.23	146	2.06	330	31	.906	80.0	3.48