Players

Adam Lundqvist 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	17	11	14	17

Season 8 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
1,006 12th	21 343rd	57 1st	103 50th	42 189th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	6	3	1	1.00	15	.933	32	10.67	69	.464	5.0	6.65
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	12	1	3	0.33	18	.833	31	10.33	45	.689	2.0	6.23
5	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	2	.500	14	3	0	0.60	27	1.000	63	12.60	112	.563	5.0	8.38
6	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	6	.000	11	4	3	0.80	25	.880	50	10.00	94	.532	6.0	5.41
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	10	2	2	0.67	18	.889	48	16.00	64	.750	3.0	9.59
9	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	0	0.67	17	1.000	34	11.33	62	.548	3.5	7.84
10	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	11	5	1	1.67	18	.944	38	12.67	66	.576	7.5	9.73
12	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	6	.500	11	5	1	1.67	20	.950	37	12.33	64	.578	8.0	8.13
15	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	1	.000	15	3	0	0.60	28	1.000	57	11.40	107	.533	4.0	7.05
16	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	7	.286	8	3	2	0.75	20	.900	54	13.50	93	.581	8.5	10.00
17	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	10	2	2	0.67	17	.882	34	11.33	53	.642	5.5	8.82
20	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	7	.000	3	1	1	0.33	12	.917	35	11.67	64	.547	1.0	6.16
22	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	6	.000	6	1	1	0.25	17	.941	48	12.00	83	.578	3.5	6.74
26	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	13	3	0	1.00	21	1.000	26	8.67	49	.531	4.0	5.41
30	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	4	.000	15	5	0	1.25	25	1.000	48	12.00	79	.608	6.5	8.05
33	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	4	.000	10	3	1	0.75	21	.952	56	14.00	91	.615	5.5	9.60
34	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	6	.500	14	1	1	0.20	29	.966	56	11.20	100	.560	4.5	7.34
35	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	3	.000	10	3	2	0.75	22	.909	59	14.75	92	.641	3.0	8.47
39	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	7	.143	6	1	3	0.20	20	.850	53	10.60	89	.596	2.5	5.20
40	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	5	.400	2	0	2	0.00	16	.875	51	12.75	91	.560	2.5	7.34
44	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	6	.000	4	1	3	0.25	15	.800	50	12.50	90	.556	2.0	7.20
45	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	10	5	5	1.25	21	.762	46	11.50	72	.639	7.0	7.37
Total		84	21	0.25	5	86	.186	209	57	34	0.68	442	.923	1006	11.98	1729	.582	100.0	7.58

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.65
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.23
5	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.38
6	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.41
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	9.59
9	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.84
10	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	9.73
12	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	8.13
15	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.05
16	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	1	5	6	0	1.50	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	10.00
17	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	2	1.00	9	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.82
20	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	6.16
22	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.74
26	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	10	3.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.41
30	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	8.05
33	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	9.60
34	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	10	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.34
35	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.47
39	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.20
40	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.34
44	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.20
45	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.37
Total		84	2	40	42	3	0.50	103	1.23	.	.	.	.	.	100.0	7.58