Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	4	1.00	9	.444	0.0	5.43
8	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	5	.600	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	6.55
14	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	3.38
19	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.33	8	.750	3	1.00	3	1.000	1.0	3.91
29	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	2	0.67	7	.286	0.0	4.23
Total		16	.	.	.	.	.	10	1	9	0.06	36	.750	13	0.81	26	.500	1.0	4.70

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	17	2.06	33	6	.818	0.0	5.43
8	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	2.50	14	0	1.000	0.0	6.55
14	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	2.11	9	1	.889	0.0	3.38
19	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	2.00	15	1	.933	1.0	3.91
29	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	2.36	14	0	1.000	0.0	4.23
Total		16	.	.	.	.	.	25	1.56	43	2.18	85	8	.906	1.0	4.70