Players

Michael Brink 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	18	17	16	17	9

Season 8 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
343 7th	.413 107th	30 33rd	100 61st	62 76th

Career Honors

S82nd All-BIG-8

S91st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

S10Player of SeasonMVP BIG-81st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	20	-.050	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.27
3	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	7	32	.250	3	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.62
5	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	17	.353	4	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	10.0	7.47
6	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	3	30	.467	6	0	4	0.00	16	.750	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.98
7	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	22	.273	9	3	4	0.75	17	.765	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.81
8	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	17	.412	5	2	3	0.67	11	.727	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.86
10	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	3	21	.429	13	3	2	0.60	25	.920	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.59
12	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	0	19	.842	4	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	20.0	9.32
13	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	6	27	.333	7	0	2	0.00	18	.889	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.41
14	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	18	4.50	5	25	.520	7	2	2	0.50	18	.889	1	0.25	1	1.000	21.5	7.55
17	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	4	23	.522	1	0	1	0.00	11	.909	0	0.00	2	.000	18.0	7.80
18	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	26	5.20	9	45	.378	19	2	4	0.40	30	.867	.	.	.	.	29.5	10.00
21	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	15	.533	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.13
22	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	19	.368	7	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.63
25	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	5	23	.348	8	1	0	0.25	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.69
26	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	19	.684	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	1	0.33	1	1.000	15.5	9.16
30	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	5	29	.310	4	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.11
32	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	4	30	.500	12	4	2	1.00	21	.905	0	0.00	1	.000	24.5	7.70
35	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	0	17	.588	1	0	3	0.00	11	.727	0	0.00	1	.000	12.5	6.60
37	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	4	29	.517	9	2	4	0.50	21	.810	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.25
39	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	5	27	.407	7	3	4	0.75	18	.778	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.46
40	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	22	.500	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	1	0.33	1	1.000	13.5	8.03
42	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	24	.208	3	2	0	0.67	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.20
44	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	6	22	.227	4	2	2	0.50	13	.846	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	6.30
45	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	1	24	.583	3	1	3	0.20	18	.833	.	.	.	.	18.5	6.80
Total		94	343	3.65	96	598	.413	142	30	49	0.32	371	.868	3	0.03	9	.333	406.0	7.47

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	7	2.08	13	2	.846	5.5	3.27
3	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	12	2.13	23	3	.870	16.0	6.62
5	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	9	2.58	12	0	1.000	10.0	7.47
6	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	18	2.31	29	2	.931	18.0	7.98
7	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	17	2.31	32	1	.969	15.5	6.81
8	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	10	2.53	15	0	1.000	12.0	7.86
10	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	11	2.20	17	2.52	27	1	.963	16.0	6.59
12	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	9	2.43	14	1	.929	20.0	9.32
13	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	19	2.15	39	2	.949	16.5	6.41
14	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	14	2.14	29	2	.931	21.5	7.55
17	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	12	2.47	17	1	.941	18.0	7.80
18	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	12	2.40	14	2.63	19	1	.947	29.5	10.00
21	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	7	2.64	11	0	1.000	12.5	8.13
22	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	6	2.55	11	0	1.000	12.0	8.63
25	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	10	2.47	19	0	1.000	15.0	7.69
26	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	8	2.67	8	2.64	11	0	1.000	15.5	9.16
30	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.23	13	1	.923	15.0	6.11
32	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	7	2.00	17	1	.941	24.5	7.70
35	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	6	2.21	14	0	1.000	12.5	6.60
37	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	13	2.47	19	1	.947	21.0	8.25
39	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	1	0.25	9	2.50	14	0	1.000	21.0	8.46
40	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	10	2.64	14	0	1.000	13.5	8.03
42	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	11	2.35	20	1	.950	13.0	7.20
44	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	8	2.00	12	2.30	20	2	.900	13.5	6.30
45	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	17	2.44	25	3	.880	18.5	6.80
Total		94	4	58	62	3	0.66	100	1.06	282	2.36	477	25	.948	406.0	7.47