Players

Michael Brink 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	18	17	16	17	9

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
422 1st	.505 56th	41 5th	70 155th	75 27th

Career Honors

S82nd All-BIG-8

S91st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

S10Player of SeasonMVP BIG-81st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	21	.381	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.59
2	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	21	4.20	9	42	.286	4	2	2	0.40	16	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	25.5	7.87
4	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	18	3.60	9	36	.250	3	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.75
6	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	13	.615	2	1	1	0.33	11	.909	3	1.00	3	1.000	11.5	6.25
7	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	6	24	.333	4	1	3	0.33	13	.769	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.58
8	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	21	5.25	6	35	.429	5	1	0	0.25	15	1.000	1	0.25	2	.500	23.0	7.14
10	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	5	31	.452	9	1	3	0.20	21	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	22.5	8.55
11	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	13	.538	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.60
13	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	20	.650	10	3	2	1.00	18	.889	.	.	.	.	17.5	9.58
14	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	13	.462	10	4	1	1.33	18	.944	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	7.27
18	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	19	6.33	3	27	.593	12	1	2	0.33	19	.895	.	.	.	.	21.0	9.36
19	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	17	.765	7	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	16.5	10.00
22	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	26	5.20	5	36	.583	18	2	2	0.40	28	.929	0	0.00	3	.000	29.5	9.52
23	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	5	23	.391	8	2	2	0.50	20	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	18.0	8.03
26	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	2	22	.591	4	3	1	1.00	13	.923	1	0.33	1	1.000	19.0	8.77
27	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	17	5.67	0	23	.739	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.68
29	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	15	.733	11	0	1	0.00	17	.941	.	.	.	.	13.5	9.55
33	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	25	6.25	3	32	.688	6	3	4	0.75	16	.750	.	.	.	.	29.5	8.84
34	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	21	4.20	4	30	.567	8	0	1	0.00	21	.952	2	0.40	3	.667	22.5	8.85
38	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	5	24	.500	8	4	3	1.00	21	.857	.	.	.	.	23.5	9.60
39	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	18	4.50	2	22	.727	6	2	1	0.50	17	.941	2	0.50	2	1.000	21.0	7.86
43	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	18	3.60	5	30	.433	10	2	1	0.40	19	.947	0	0.00	2	.000	21.0	7.73
44	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	27	5.40	6	40	.525	7	2	4	0.40	20	.800	1	0.20	1	1.000	31.0	9.28
45	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	3	23	.522	3	3	2	1.00	9	.778	0	0.00	2	.000	21.5	9.28
48	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	18	4.50	6	31	.387	6	2	2	0.50	17	.882	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.50
Total		95	422	4.44	97	643	.505	174	41	46	0.43	414	.889	10	0.11	23	.435	501.0	8.40

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	3	2.08	12	1	.917	14.0	7.59
2	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	14	2.32	25	0	1.000	25.5	7.87
4	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	19	2.58	26	1	.962	20.5	7.75
6	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	8	2.27	15	0	1.000	11.5	6.25
7	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	4	2.14	7	1	.857	15.0	7.58
8	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	5	1.93	15	0	1.000	23.0	7.14
10	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	18	2.65	23	0	1.000	22.5	8.55
11	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	9	2.50	14	0	1.000	12.5	7.60
13	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	9	3.00	8	2.50	14	0	1.000	17.5	9.58
14	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	10	2.60	15	0	1.000	13.0	7.27
18	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	8	2.46	13	1	.923	21.0	9.36
19	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	10	2.91	11	0	1.000	16.5	10.00
22	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	6	1.20	11	2.42	19	0	1.000	29.5	9.52
23	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	2	1.00	2	0.50	15	2.52	23	0	1.000	18.0	8.03
26	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	12	2.59	17	0	1.000	19.0	8.77
27	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	12	2.38	16	3	.813	18.0	8.68
29	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	8	2.78	9	0	1.000	13.5	9.55
33	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	11	2.38	21	0	1.000	29.5	8.84
34	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	19	2.82	22	0	1.000	22.5	8.85
38	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	6	1.50	17	2.80	20	0	1.000	23.5	9.60
39	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	10	2.33	15	2	.867	21.0	7.86
43	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	15	2.45	22	2	.909	21.0	7.73
44	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	3	0.60	17	2.63	24	0	1.000	31.0	9.28
45	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	1	0.33	6	2.56	9	0	1.000	21.5	9.28
48	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	12	2.23	26	1	.962	20.5	7.50
Total		95	1	74	75	5	0.79	70	0.74	281	2.48	433	12	.972	501.0	8.40