Players

Peter Van Norden 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	14	15	11	-

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
178 123rd	.430 119th	16 150th	28 312th	60 74th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	16	.625	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	15.0	9.93
2	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	12	.667	4	1	3	0.25	13	.769	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.12
4	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	0	16	.813	3	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.42
5	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	9	.222	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.87
8	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	15	.133	6	1	3	0.25	15	.800	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.56
9	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	7	.429	4	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.83
10	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	9	.111	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.50
11	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	13	.462	7	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.78
13	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	7	.714	5	1	3	0.33	14	.786	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.60
14	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	18	.444	9	2	2	0.50	17	.882	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.97
17	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	18	.389	8	2	6	0.40	21	.714	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.50
18	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	5	.600	12	2	2	0.67	18	.889	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.42
21	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	12	.000	2	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.82
22	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	11	.364	7	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.60
25	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	18	.556	4	1	3	0.25	12	.750	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.50
26	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	2	12	.417	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.47
29	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	11	.545	4	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.55
32	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	9	.444	3	2	0	0.67	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.13
34	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	19	.263	3	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.27
35	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	10	.200	2	1	2	0.33	6	.667	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.78
39	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	8	.500	7	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.75
40	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	5	12	.000	5	1	2	0.20	14	.857	.	.	.	.	6.0	2.33
44	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	10	.800	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.83
45	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	14	.643	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.88
Total		85	178	2.09	53	291	.430	109	16	48	0.19	282	.830	.	.	.	.	225.0	5.93

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	0	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	9.93
2	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.12
4	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.42
5	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.87
8	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.56
9	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.83
10	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.50
11	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.78
13	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.60
14	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.97
17	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.50
18	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.42
21	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	1	2.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.82
22	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.60
25	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.50
26	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.47
29	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.55
32	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.13
34	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.27
35	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.78
39	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.75
40	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	2.33
44	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.83
45	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.88
Total		85	2	58	60	5	0.71	28	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	225.0	5.93