Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	5	22	.182	10	2	5	0.50	19	.737	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.23
6	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	16	.375	4	2	2	0.67	11	.818	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.66
8	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	16	.000	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.44
12	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	7	12	-.250	1	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.22
14	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	9	.556	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.19
17	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	4	10	-.100	8	2	2	0.50	17	.882	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.03
25	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	15	.533	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.25
29	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	16	-.063	1	0	3	0.00	7	.571	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.92
41	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	7	.000	10	0	3	0.00	18	.833	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.81
Total		30	50	1.67	32	123	.146	41	7	19	0.23	105	.819	.	.	.	.	61.0	4.64

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.23
6	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.66
8	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.44
12	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.22
14	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.19
17	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.03
25	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.25
29	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.92
41	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.81
Total		30	0	8	8	1	0.27	31	1.03	.	.	.	.	.	61.0	4.64