Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	2	0.20	18	.889	2	0.40	3	.667	1.0	4.63
5	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	5	1.67	7	.714	1.0	3.85
7	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	4	0.00	21	.810	3	0.60	8	.375	0.0	4.15
8	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	15	.933	5	1.25	7	.714	0.0	7.53
11	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	2	0.20	19	.895	2	0.40	6	.333	1.0	7.33
12	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	3	0.00	17	.824	1	0.33	1	1.000	0.0	7.13
14	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.33	9	.889	3	1.00	5	.600	1.0	8.98
16	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	3	0.00	11	.727	4	1.33	4	1.000	0.0	5.35
19	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	5.41
20	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.25	14	.857	4	1.00	6	.667	1.0	7.87
21	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	1	0.67	15	.933	4	1.33	8	.500	2.0	10.00
22	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	0	0.00	6	.000	0.0	4.15
25	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	0	0.50	12	1.000	6	1.50	10	.600	2.0	6.89
26	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	2	0.25	9	.778	4	1.00	6	.667	1.0	5.00
31	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	3	1	0.75	17	.941	2	0.50	4	.500	3.0	4.46
36	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	4	1	1.33	12	.917	2	0.67	4	.500	4.0	8.26
Total		59	.	.	.	.	.	84	17	24	0.29	213	.887	51	0.86	90	.567	17.0	6.31

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	15	2.11	27	3	.889	1.0	4.63
5	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	2.00	25	3	.880	1.0	3.85
7	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	18	1.85	40	6	.850	0.0	4.15
8	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	6	2.27	15	0	1.000	0.0	7.53
11	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	17	2.50	26	1	.962	1.0	7.33
12	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	12	2.30	23	1	.957	0.0	7.13
14	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	2.73	11	0	1.000	1.0	8.98
16	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	2.22	18	0	1.000	0.0	5.35
19	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	10	2.05	21	2	.905	0.0	5.41
20	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	21	2.59	27	1	.963	1.0	7.87
21	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	15	5.00	7	2.50	10	1	.900	2.0	10.00
22	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	14	2.23	26	2	.923	0.0	4.15
25	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	10	2.33	15	2	.867	2.0	6.89
26	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	13	2.27	26	0	1.000	1.0	5.00
31	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	11	2.35	20	0	1.000	3.0	4.46
36	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	16	5.33	9	2.17	18	0	1.000	4.0	8.26
Total		59	.	.	.	.	.	139	2.36	190	2.24	348	22	.937	17.0	6.31