Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

Conference League Round 7

Why Do I Care?

Kentucky Panthers

Matthew Fowler

(H)
at Nashville

Nashville Red Pandas

Roy Rolsten

Nashville leads series 23-6

Match Comments

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Kentucky			Nashville
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
85.75	B+	Libero		A+	97.50
74.88	B-	Middle Blockers		B	80.00
70.38	C+	Outside Hitters		A	93.50
72.00	C+	Right Side		A+	100.25
63.00	C-	Setter		B-	77.00
		Skills Prediction

	29 MATCHES
6	WINS	23
5	HOME	12
1	AWAY	8
0	NEUTRAL	3

Kentucky		Nashville
#30	ELO Rank	#7

1,461.60	ELO Rating	1,520.73 (+145)

0.0%	ELO Winning Chance	0.0%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.196 25th	ATTACK PCT	.249 20th
10.73 25th	KILLS PER SET	12.92 3rd
.841 17th	SERVE PCT	.885 2nd
1.27 28th	ACES PER SET	1.5 18th
.429 27th	ASSIST PCT	.483 16th
10.09 23rd	ASSISTS PER SET	12.75 2nd
4.64 14th	BLOCKS PER SET	5.08 8th
6.09 28th	DIGS PER SET	8.75 10th
.921 11th	RECEIVE PCT	.970 1st
2.119 19th	PASSER RATING	2.208 3rd

	TOP TWO
Heine (OH) 25 Poulsen (RS) 23	KILLS	Plummer (RS) 32 Morris (OH) 29
Pertinax (S) .500 Heine (OH) .438	ATTACK PCT	Sanderson (MB) .429 Brown (OH) .422
Percival (S) 82 Pertinax (S) 15	ASSISTS	Pereira (S) 117 Spence (S) 20
Robins (MB) 3 Percival (S) 2	ACES	Stoff (L) 4 Morris (OH) 4
Robins (MB) 11 Heine (OH) 9	BLOCKS	Sanderson (MB) 12 Brown (OH) 12
Santana (L) 27 Percival (S) 8	DIGS	Stoff (L) 29 Plummer (RS) 15
Francis (OH) 2.26 Santana (L) 2.26	PASSER RTG	Kersten (L) 2.47 Stoff (L) 2.33

#	TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
3.	Logan Stoff Senior A- 2.33 Passer Rating 3.22 Digs Per Set	8.43
8.	Noah Santana Senior B+ 2.26 Passer Rating 3.38 Digs Per Set	7.48

#		TOP SETTERS	Rtg
4.		Bruno Pereira Senior B- 13.00 Assists Per Set 1.67 Service Pts Per Set	7.96

#		TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
4.		TJ Plummer Senior A 3.56 Kills Per Set 1.22 Blocks Per Set	8.69

#		TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
8.		Wayne Sanderson Soph. B- 1.33 Blocks Per Set 2.44 Kills Per Set	8.37

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
5	7	Apr 23, 2022	0	-	3	19-25	18-25	14-25			SEC	0	-	1
5	29	Jun 04, 2022	1	-	3	24-26	21-25	25-17	23-25		SEC	1	-	1
6	2	Jul 31, 2022	0	-	3	23-25	24-26	17-25			SEC	2	-	1
6	11	Aug 20, 2022	1	-	3	25-21	18-25	20-25	23-25		SEC	2	-	2
7	5	Nov 19, 2022	2	-	3	16-25	25-14	20-25	25-12	11-15	SEC	3	-	2
7	39	Jan 28, 2023	0	-	3	18-25	23-25	23-25			SEC	3	-	3
8	7	Mar 05, 2023	2	-	3	25-20	23-25	22-25	26-24	11-15	SEC	4	-	3
8	29	Apr 16, 2023	1	-	3	25-23	12-25	23-25	21-25		SEC	4	-	4
8	38	Apr 23, 2023	0	- (n)	3	21-25	20-25	18-25			Holyoke Invitational8-38Quarterfinals Holyoke Invitational	4	-	5
9	14	Jun 25, 2023	3	-	1	25-22	25-23	19-25	25-22		SEC	4	-	6
9	44	Aug 13, 2023	3	-	0	28-26	25-15	25-20			SEC	5	-	6
10	14	Oct 08, 2023	0	-	3	13-25	14-25	18-25			SEC	5	-	7
10	33	Nov 05, 2023	0	- (n)	3	22-25	13-25	10-25			Holyoke Invitational10-33Sweet 16 Holyoke Invitational	5	-	8
10	44	Nov 26, 2023	3	-	0	25-13	25-17	25-18			SEC	5	-	9
11	14	Jan 14, 2024	3	-	0	25-19	25-17	25-18			SEC	5	-	10
11	19	Jan 22, 2024	0	-	3	18-25	22-25	18-25			SEC Tournament11-19Quarterfinals SEC Tournament	5	-	11
11	44	Mar 03, 2024	0	-	3	15-25	13-25	14-25			SEC	5	-	12
12	8	May 12, 2024	0	-	3	16-25	23-25	10-25			SEC	5	-	13
12	34	Jun 30, 2024	3	-	0	25-20	25-15	25-20			SEC	5	-	14
13	8	Sep 29, 2024	0	-	3	20-25	15-25	21-25			SEC	6	-	14
13	34	Nov 17, 2024	0	-	3	18-25	13-25	20-25			SEC	6	-	15
14	7	Dec 29, 2024	0	-	3	19-25	10-25	14-25			SEC	6	-	16
14	29	Feb 16, 2025	3	-	0	29-27	25-22	25-21			SEC	6	-	17
14	33	Feb 16, 2025	0	- (n)	3	14-25	14-25	18-25			Holyoke Invitational14-33Sweet 16 Holyoke Invitational	6	-	18
15	4	Jun 15, 2025	3	-	0	25-20	25-13	25-16			SEC	6	-	19
15	13	Jul 06, 2025	0	-	3	16-25	11-25	11-25			SEC	6	-	20
16	4	Sep 21, 2025	0	-	3	15-25	9-25	18-25			SEC	6	-	21
16	13	Oct 12, 2025	3	-	2	25-23	25-16	17-25	21-25	15-11	SEC	6	-	22
17	1	Feb 08, 2026	3	-	1	25-21	25-22	18-25	25-16		SEC	6	-	23
17	10	Mar 01, 2026									SEC

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.