Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

WGM Cup Round 2

Competition Info | Bracket Link | Why Do I Care?

San Diego Swordfish

Matt White

(H)
at Columbia

Columbia Crazy Tomatoes

Steve Turner

Columbia leads series 12-7

Match Comments

Having done a Spurs in the Conference I better do well in this competition.

Steve (Columbia) Jun 26 - 11:42 AM

Another season with a poor cup run

Matt (San Diego) Jun 29 - 6:47 AM

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

San Diego			Columbia
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
88.50	A-	Libero		B-	76.50
81.75	B	Middle Blockers		A+	99.25
77.88	B-	Outside Hitters		A-	86.38
72.75	C+	Right Side		A	93.75
80.00	B	Setter		B+	83.75
		Skills Prediction

	19 MATCHES
7	WINS	12
4	HOME	7
0	AWAY	2
3	NEUTRAL	3

San Diego		Columbia
#28	ELO Rank	#13

1,384.17	ELO Rating	1,529.33 (+145)

20.1%	ELO Winning Chance	79.9%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.293 28th	ATTACK PCT	.415 2nd
11.81 26th	KILLS PER SET	13.80 3rd
.854 22nd	SERVE PCT	.864 13th
1.35 26th	ACES PER SET	1.66 12th
.513 22nd	ASSIST PCT	.612 2nd
11.38 26th	ASSISTS PER SET	13.4 2nd
3.65 29th	BLOCKS PER SET	3.87 23rd
6.12 29th	DIGS PER SET	6.55 18th
.905 29th	RECEIVE PCT	.921 10th
2.127 25th	PASSER RATING	2.168 14th

	TOP TWO
Grimes (OH) 191 Alves (MB) 116	KILLS	Kelso (OH) 193 Fletcher (RS) 189
Grimes (OH) .450 Ferrara (S) .353	ATTACK PCT	Rivera (MB) .582 Fletcher (RS) .561
Zuma (S) 479 Ferrara (S) 201	ASSISTS	Rezende (S) 646 Boyle (S) 474
Mackinnon (L) 22 Grimes (OH) 19	ACES	Rezende (S) 24 Rivera (MB) 24
Buglioni (MB) 41 Silva (OH) 35	BLOCKS	Rivera (MB) 49 Fletcher (RS) 39
Mackinnon (L) 134 Rosenthal (RS) 58	DIGS	Stover (L) 92 Baptiste (OH) 76
Mackinnon (L) 2.41 Reese (L) 2.17	PASSER RTG	Hinata (L) 2.40 Christiansen (L) 2.35

#		TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
8.		Ky Mackinnon Senior A- 2.41 Passer Rating 2.31 Digs Per Set	7.13

#		TOP SETTERS	Rtg
8.		Lucas Rezende Soph. B- 12.92 Assists Per Set 1.82 Service Pts Per Set	8.13

#		TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
3.		Austin Fletcher Junior A- 3.57 Kills Per Set 0.74 Blocks Per Set	7.88

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	8	Sep 05, 2020	0	-	3	18-25	23-25	20-25			Eastern Conference	1	-	0
1	25	Oct 10, 2020	0	-	3	23-25	14-25	13-25			Eastern Conference	1	-	1
1	30	Oct 17, 2020	3	- (n)	1	26-24	25-22	22-25	25-15		TMVL Grand Championship1-30Group Round TMVL Grand Championship	2	-	1
1	34	Oct 24, 2020	3	- (n)	2	25-22	25-20	22-25	16-25	15-13	TMVL Grand Championship	2	-	2
2	8	Feb 06, 2021	0	-	3	21-25	20-25	20-25			Eastern Conference	3	-	2
2	21	Feb 27, 2021	1	-	3	25-21	21-25	24-26	21-25		Eastern Conference	3	-	3
3	8	Sep 04, 2021	1	-	3	25-22	16-25	17-25	13-25		Eastern Conference	3	-	4
3	14	Sep 11, 2021	3	- (n)	2	22-25	25-15	23-25	25-18	15-10	TMVL Cup3-14Quarterfinals TMVL Cup	3	-	5
3	21	Sep 25, 2021	1	-	3	22-25	23-25	25-18	21-25		Eastern Conference	4	-	5
4	9	Dec 11, 2021	3	-	0	25-22	25-12	25-20			Eastern Conference	4	-	6
4	21	Jan 01, 2022	1	-	3	25-22	18-25	18-25	23-25		Eastern Conference	4	-	7
4	22	Jan 01, 2022	0	-	3	12-25	14-25	12-25			Eastern Conference Tournament4-22Quarterfinals Eastern Conference Tournament	4	-	8
5	3	Apr 09, 2022	3	- (n)	0	25-21	26-24	25-23			William G. Morgan Cup5-3Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	4	-	9
5	12	Apr 30, 2022	0	-	3	11-25	14-25	12-25			William G. Morgan Cup5-12Round of 32 William G. Morgan Cup	4	-	10
5	25	May 28, 2022	3	-	0	25-16	25-17	25-21			Non-Conference	4	-	11
7	17	Dec 24, 2022	1	-	3	20-25	25-21	18-25	19-25		Non-Conference	5	-	11
7	41	Jan 28, 2023	2	- (n)	3	19-25	25-23	25-18	21-25	10-15	TMVL Shield	6	-	11
10	17	Oct 15, 2023	2	-	3	25-19	20-25	20-25	25-23	10-15	Non-Conference	6	-	12
14	9	Dec 29, 2024	3	- (n)	0	25-15	25-18	25-18			William G. Morgan Cup14-9Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	7	-	12
15	12	Jun 29, 2025	0	-	3	11-25	19-25	19-25			William G. Morgan Cup15-12Round of 32 William G. Morgan Cup	7	-	13

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.