Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

Conference Tournament Quarterfinals

Bracket Link | Why Do I Care?

Baton Rouge Bananas

Mike Halpin

(H)
at Merritt Island

Merritt Island Manatees

Mark Creasey

Baton Rouge leads series 24-7

Match Comments

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Baton Rouge			Merritt Island
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
77.75	B-	Libero		A-	89.50
74.13	B-	Middle Blockers		B+	82.25
81.75	B	Outside Hitters		B	81.25
72.75	C+	Right Side		A-	86.25
72.25	C+	Setter		B+	83.50
		Skills Prediction

	31 MATCHES
24	WINS	7
14	HOME	4
9	AWAY	2
1	NEUTRAL	1

Baton Rouge		Merritt Island
#28	ELO Rank	#18

1,425.46	ELO Rating	1,480.97 (+145)

24.0%	ELO Winning Chance	76.0%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.268 29th	ATTACK PCT	.314 20th
12.07 21st	KILLS PER SET	11.64 28th
.845 28th	SERVE PCT	.843 30th
1.53 18th	ACES PER SET	1.56 17th
.49 27th	ASSIST PCT	.522 19th
11.62 22nd	ASSISTS PER SET	11.25 29th
3.75 26th	BLOCKS PER SET	3.87 22nd
7.45 4th	DIGS PER SET	6.69 24th
.908 24th	RECEIVE PCT	.904 30th
2.141 20th	PASSER RATING	2.103 29th

	TOP TWO
Califf (OH) 125 Camacho (OH) 109	KILLS	Loko (OH) 108 Casoli (OH) 107
Taylor (MB) .461 Firpo (S) .426	ATTACK PCT	Endres (MB) .500 Casoli (OH) .464
Firpo (S) 374 Gibson (S) 259	ASSISTS	Dekker (S) 416 Metzner (S) 99
Firpo (S) 15 Santos (L) 13	ACES	Casoli (OH) 15 Dekker (S) 13
Hodges (MB) 31 Camacho (OH) 24	BLOCKS	Endres (MB) 39 Morelli (MB) 30
Santos (L) 91 Saridakis (L) 54	DIGS	Contreras (L) 85 Casoli (OH) 50
Califf (OH) 2.26 Cotton (OH) 2.21	PASSER RTG	Casoli (OH) 2.32 Loko (OH) 2.29

#		TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
13.		Jorge Santos Junior B- 2.20 Passer Rating 2.39 Digs Per Set	6.74

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
5	8	Apr 23, 2022	3	-	2	21-25	28-26	22-25	25-19	23-21	SEC	1	-	0
5	19	May 14, 2022	0	-	3	16-25	23-25	17-25			SEC Tournament5-19Quarterfinals SEC Tournament	2	-	0
5	34	Jun 11, 2022	0	-	3	21-25	20-25	16-25			SEC	3	-	0
5	45	Jun 25, 2022	0	- (n)	3	16-25	19-25	14-25			TMVL Cup	4	-	0
6	8	Aug 13, 2022	3	-	0	25-19	25-16	25-16			SEC	5	-	0
6	34	Oct 01, 2022	0	-	3	12-25	19-25	21-25			SEC	6	-	0
7	4	Nov 19, 2022	0	-	3	11-25	9-25	13-25			SEC	7	-	0
7	13	Dec 17, 2022	3	-	0	25-11	25-12	25-13			SEC	8	-	0
8	2	Feb 19, 2023	3	-	0	26-24	25-21	25-15			SEC	9	-	0
8	11	Mar 12, 2023	0	-	3	17-25	11-25	15-25			SEC	10	-	0
8	16	Mar 19, 2023	3	-	1	25-19	19-25	27-25	25-21		William G. Morgan Cup8-16Sweet 16 William G. Morgan Cup	10	-	1
8	19	Mar 26, 2023	0	-	3	9-25	15-25	8-25			SEC Tournament8-19Quarterfinals SEC Tournament	11	-	1
9	1	May 29, 2023	0	-	3	18-25	16-25	20-25			SEC	11	-	2
9	10	Jun 18, 2023	2	-	3	23-25	25-20	20-25	25-22	14-16	SEC	12	-	2
10	14	Oct 08, 2023	3	-	1	21-25	25-19	25-17	25-21		SEC	13	-	2
10	19	Oct 15, 2023	0	-	3	20-25	13-25	12-25			SEC Tournament10-19Quarterfinals SEC Tournament	14	-	2
10	44	Nov 26, 2023	0	-	3	18-25	15-25	21-25			SEC	15	-	2
11	1	Dec 17, 2023	0	-	3	14-25	17-25	11-25			SEC	16	-	2
11	10	Jan 07, 2024	0	-	3	20-25	18-25	22-25			SEC	16	-	3
12	14	May 27, 2024	0	-	3	21-25	16-25	18-25			SEC	17	-	3
12	38	Jun 30, 2024	3	- (n)	1	25-22	15-25	25-22	26-24		Holyoke Invitational12-38Quarterfinals Holyoke Invitational	17	-	4
12	44	Jul 14, 2024	3	-	0	25-18	25-23	25-22			SEC	18	-	4
13	8	Sep 29, 2024	0	-	3	20-25	15-25	16-25			SEC	19	-	4
13	34	Nov 17, 2024	3	-	2	25-23	19-25	25-16	22-25	15-10	SEC	20	-	4
14	1	Dec 15, 2024	0	-	3	21-25	14-25	12-25			SEC	20	-	5
14	10	Jan 05, 2025	3	-	2	22-25	25-22	25-16	21-25	15-13	SEC	20	-	6
15	1	Jun 08, 2025	3	-	0	25-19	28-26	25-22			SEC	21	-	6
15	10	Jun 29, 2025	2	-	3	22-25	25-22	22-25	25-23	7-15	SEC	22	-	6
16	5	Sep 21, 2025	0	-	3	29-31	17-25	14-25			SEC	23	-	6
16	39	Nov 23, 2025	3	-	1	25-23	28-30	28-26	25-23		SEC	24	-	6
17	7	Feb 22, 2026	0	-	3	20-25	19-25	8-25			SEC	24	-	7
17	19	Mar 15, 2026									SEC Tournament17-19Quarterfinals SEC Tournament
17	29	Apr 05, 2026									SEC

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.