Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

WGM Cup Group (1)

Competition Info | Bracket Link | Why Do I Care?

Pekin Pushin Peas

Roger Mendonça

(N)
Neutral Court

Schenectady Squirrels

Brian Beerman

Schenectady leads series 13-6

Match Comments

That’s a lot of green ticks for the Squirrels

Roger (Pekin) Feb 01 - 12:18 PM

Technically more than you, Roger, but we're pragmatic here: An easy win for the Peas.

Brian (Schenectady) Feb 02 - 1:38 PM

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Pekin			Schenectady
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
94.25	A+	Libero		A+	97.50
91.00	A	Middle Blockers		B+	84.50
86.50	A-	Outside Hitters		B	80.38
85.75	B+	Right Side		A+	94.00
78.75	B	Setter		A-	86.00
		Skills Prediction

	19 MATCHES
6	WINS	13
3	HOME	7
0	AWAY	1
3	NEUTRAL	5

Pekin		Schenectady
#5	ELO Rank	#22

1,615.79	ELO Rating	1,443.59

59.0%	ELO Winning Chance	41.0%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.437 3rd	ATTACK PCT	.315 28th
13.73 3rd	KILLS PER SET	12.27 26th
.868 10th	SERVE PCT	.847 29th
1.69 11th	ACES PER SET	1.36 26th
.611 3rd	ASSIST PCT	.506 28th
13.36 3rd	ASSISTS PER SET	11.78 28th
4.13 11th	BLOCKS PER SET	3.53 30th
6.16 24th	DIGS PER SET	6.9 4th
.921 9th	RECEIVE PCT	.913 27th
2.211 2nd	PASSER RATING	2.161 20th

	TOP TWO
Deschain (OH) 312 Wiggins (MB) 311	KILLS	Capdevila (RS) 220 Alvarado (MB) 156
Pelton (MB) .588 Wiggins (MB) .585	ATTACK PCT	Obelix (MB) .476 Capdevila (RS) .429
Favaro (S) 1142 Mulder (S) 506	ASSISTS	Lee (S) 941 Marshal (S) 248
Pelton (MB) 52 Preuss (OH) 35	ACES	Lee (S) 33 Capdevila (RS) 20
Wiggins (MB) 96 Pelton (MB) 79	BLOCKS	Alvarado (MB) 54 Obelix (MB) 44
Blackburn (L) 153 Favaro (S) 95	DIGS	Beerman (L) 122 Lee (S) 97
Blackburn (L) 2.53 Preuss (OH) 2.30	PASSER RTG	Beerman (L) 2.39 Nicholson (L) 2.33

#		TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
2.		Santos Blackburn Junior A+ 2.53 Passer Rating 1.72 Digs Per Set	7.40

#		TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
6.		Kirk Regan Soph. B+ 3.18 Kills Per Set 0.73 Blocks Per Set	7.55

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	1	Aug 22, 2020	0	-	3	23-25	14-25	20-25			Western Conference	1	-	0
1	12	Sep 12, 2020	0	-	3	21-25	18-25	18-25			Western Conference	1	-	1
1	19	Sep 26, 2020	0	-	3	16-25	13-25	18-25			Western Conference Tournament1-19Quarterfinals Western Conference Tournament	1	-	2
2	2	Jan 23, 2021	0	-	3	22-25	11-25	23-25			Western Conference	1	-	3
2	16	Feb 20, 2021	3	-	1	25-14	18-25	25-11	25-19		Western Conference	1	-	4
2	38	Mar 27, 2021	1	- (n)	3	25-23	18-25	13-25	17-25		TMVL Shield	1	-	5
3	2	Aug 21, 2021	1	-	3	17-25	25-19	24-26	24-26		Western Conference	2	-	5
3	16	Sep 18, 2021	0	-	3	21-25	9-25	18-25			Western Conference	2	-	6
4	5	Dec 04, 2021	2	-	3	25-16	18-25	23-25	29-27	12-15	Western Conference	2	-	7
4	24	Jan 08, 2022	0	-	3	13-25	18-25	20-25			Western Conference	3	-	7
5	40	Jun 18, 2022	1	- (n)	3	22-25	21-25	25-21	22-25		TMVL Cup	4	-	7
6	9	Aug 13, 2022	3	- (n)	0	25-15	25-13	25-16			William G. Morgan Cup6-9Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	4	-	8
7	15	Dec 17, 2022	1	-	3	25-18	21-25	22-25	19-25		Non-Conference	4	-	9
8	32	Apr 16, 2023	3	- (n)	1	26-24	18-25	25-16	28-26		National Championship8-32Sweet 16 National Championship	5	-	9
8	35	Apr 23, 2023	3	- (n)	0	25-18	25-19	25-23			TMVL Cup	5	-	10
9	43	Aug 06, 2023	2	- (n)	3	18-25	25-22	25-19	23-25	8-15	Holyoke Invitational9-43SEMIFINALS Holyoke Invitational	6	-	10
10	12	Oct 01, 2023	1	-	3	19-25	25-22	21-25	15-25		William G. Morgan Cup10-12Round of 32 William G. Morgan Cup	6	-	11
11	36	Feb 18, 2024	3	- (n)	2	31-33	25-23	25-23	17-25	16-14	TMVL Shield	6	-	12
13	3	Sep 15, 2024	2	- (n)	3	25-27	30-32	25-22	25-22	13-15	William G. Morgan Cup13-3Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	6	-	13
17	3	Feb 08, 2026	0	- (n)	3	18-25	17-25	7-25			William G. Morgan Cup17-3Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	6	-	14
17	30	Apr 05, 2026	0	- (n)	3	18-25	20-25	16-25			TMVL Cup17-30Sweet 16 TMVL Cup	6	-	15

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.