Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

Conference League Round 1

Why Do I Care?

New Orleans Swamp Rats

Kevin Martin

(H)
at Antioch

Antioch Anglerfish

Rob Peterson

New Orleans leads series 23-21

Match Comments

Do we know these guys? This seems familiar somehow

Kevin (New Orleans) Jun 03 - 9:52 PM

RATS!

Rob (Antioch) Jun 08 - 2:45 PM

Oh, New Orleans only holds a 2 game advantage in this series. Can we narrow that down to just 1 ??

Rob (Antioch) Jun 08 - 2:46 PM

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

New Orleans			Antioch
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
91.00	A	Libero		B+	85.25
91.38	A	Middle Blockers		B+	85.88
87.88	A-	Outside Hitters		A	90.50
96.00	A+	Right Side		A	91.25
89.00	A-	Setter		B+	85.00
		Skills Prediction

	44 MATCHES
23	WINS	21
15	HOME	15
5	AWAY	4
3	NEUTRAL	2

New Orleans		Antioch
#2	ELO Rank	#24

1,578.13	ELO Rating	1,473.50 (+145)

33.1%	ELO Winning Chance	66.9%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.378 8th	ATTACK PCT	.309 22nd
13.11 9th	KILLS PER SET	12.08 24th
.859 17th	SERVE PCT	.864 12th
1.87 4th	ACES PER SET	1.34 28th
.56 10th	ASSIST PCT	.513 23rd
12.67 10th	ASSISTS PER SET	11.63 24th
4.42 11th	BLOCKS PER SET	4.61 8th
6.89 9th	DIGS PER SET	6.66 16th
.913 19th	RECEIVE PCT	.908 27th
2.177 10th	PASSER RATING	2.158 17th

	TOP TWO
Fak (RS) 216 Siegfeldt (MB) 154	KILLS	Biederman (OH) 216 Ressler (OH) 211
Fak (RS) .552 Siegfeldt (MB) .532	ATTACK PCT	Williams (MB) .500 Wallner (MB) .489
Carbonera (S) 647 Bosley (S) 327	ASSISTS	Samuel (S) 607 Cook (S) 356
Carbonera (S) 27 Laidlaw (OH) 20	ACES	Williams (MB) 20 Biederman (OH) 18
Siegfeldt (MB) 60 Eden (MB) 58	BLOCKS	Williams (MB) 73 Ressler (OH) 52
Neary (L) 121 Hatchet (L) 95	DIGS	Street (L) 155 Ressler (OH) 61
Neary (L) 2.39 Gutierrez (OH) 2.26	PASSER RTG	Bottolo (L) 2.37 Biederman (OH) 2.33

#	TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
6.	Roy Neary Senior B+ 2.39 Passer Rating 2.37 Digs Per Set	7.26
12.	Jason Street Senior B+ 2.17 Passer Rating 2.42 Digs Per Set	6.71

#		TOP SETTERS	Rtg
4.		Wallace Carbonera Soph. B+ 12.94 Assists Per Set 1.92 Service Pts Per Set	8.29

#		TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
1.		Neil Fak Senior A 4.32 Kills Per Set 0.76 Blocks Per Set	7.92

#		TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
4.		Jonah Siegfeldt Junior A- 1.13 Blocks Per Set 2.91 Kills Per Set	8.01

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	5	Aug 29, 2020	2	-	3	21-25	18-25	25-20	25-19	13-15	Eastern Conference	0	-	1
1	19	Sep 26, 2020	1	-	3	20-25	25-23	18-25	22-25		Eastern Conference Tournament1-19Quarterfinals Eastern Conference Tournament	0	-	2
1	21	Oct 03, 2020	1	-	3	15-25	20-25	25-17	22-25		Eastern Conference	1	-	2
2	1	Jan 23, 2021	1	-	3	25-23	14-25	20-25	17-25		Eastern Conference	2	-	2
2	4	Jan 23, 2021	1	- (n)	3	19-25	16-25	27-25	15-25		William G. Morgan Cup2-4Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	2	-	3
2	12	Feb 13, 2021	0	-	3	21-25	20-25	20-25			Eastern Conference	2	-	4
2	22	Feb 27, 2021	3	-	0	25-21	25-23	25-12			Eastern Conference Tournament2-22Quarterfinals Eastern Conference Tournament	3	-	4
3	1	Aug 21, 2021	0	-	3	15-25	10-25	22-25			Eastern Conference	3	-	5
3	12	Sep 11, 2021	0	-	3	19-25	20-25	21-25			Eastern Conference	4	-	5
3	19	Sep 18, 2021	1	-	3	17-25	25-19	20-25	20-25		William G. Morgan Cup3-19Sweet 16 William G. Morgan Cup	4	-	6
4	6	Dec 04, 2021	1	-	3	25-20	21-25	17-25	15-25		Eastern Conference	4	-	7
4	16	Dec 25, 2021	0	-	3	13-25	13-25	11-25			Eastern Conference	5	-	7
5	2	Apr 09, 2022	3	-	1	25-20	25-19	14-25	25-22		SEC	5	-	8
5	11	Apr 30, 2022	0	-	3	17-25	17-25	23-25			SEC	5	-	9
5	16	May 07, 2022	0	-	3	14-25	20-25	18-25			William G. Morgan Cup5-16Sweet 16 William G. Morgan Cup	6	-	9
5	23	May 21, 2022	2	-	3	25-19	25-23	24-26	18-25	7-15	SEC Tournament5-23Semifinals SEC Tournament	6	-	10
5	32	Jun 04, 2022	0	- (n)	3	21-25	16-25	22-25			National Championship5-32Sweet 16 National Championship	7	-	10
5	40	Jun 18, 2022	3	- (n)	1	25-21	25-20	18-25	25-19		TMVL Cup	8	-	10
6	8	Aug 13, 2022	0	-	3	15-25	16-25	14-25			SEC	9	-	10
6	24	Sep 10, 2022	1	-	3	18-25	29-27	31-33	18-25		William G. Morgan Cup6-24SEMIFINALS William G. Morgan Cup	10	-	10
6	34	Oct 01, 2022	1	-	3	23-25	25-22	19-25	17-25		SEC	10	-	11
7	2	Nov 12, 2022	1	-	3	17-25	25-14	23-25	21-25		SEC	11	-	11
7	11	Dec 10, 2022	1	-	3	20-25	25-22	24-26	19-25		SEC	11	-	12
7	20	Dec 24, 2022	2	-	3	25-20	23-25	18-25	27-25	13-15	William G. Morgan Cup7-20Quarterfinals William G. Morgan Cup	11	-	13
8	1	Feb 19, 2023	1	-	3	25-23	19-25	13-25	13-25		SEC	11	-	14
8	10	Mar 12, 2023	3	-	1	23-25	25-20	25-23	25-22		SEC	11	-	15
8	16	Mar 19, 2023	2	-	3	25-21	17-25	21-25	31-29	11-15	William G. Morgan Cup8-16Sweet 16 William G. Morgan Cup	12	-	15
8	19	Mar 26, 2023	3	-	2	13-25	28-26	30-28	30-32	15-12	SEC Tournament8-19Quarterfinals SEC Tournament	13	-	15
8	30	Apr 16, 2023	2	- (n)	3	23-25	20-25	25-17	25-22	14-16	TMVL Cup8-30Sweet 16 TMVL Cup	13	-	16
9	14	Jun 25, 2023	0	-	3	18-25	17-25	16-25			SEC	14	-	16
9	23	Jul 09, 2023	0	-	3	24-26	15-25	22-25			SEC Tournament9-23Semifinals SEC Tournament	15	-	16
9	44	Aug 13, 2023	3	-	0	25-22	25-18	25-23			SEC	16	-	16
10	7	Sep 24, 2023	3	-	1	25-17	25-20	17-25	25-16		SEC	16	-	17
10	29	Nov 05, 2023	0	-	3	17-25	9-25	21-25			SEC	16	-	18
11	8	Dec 31, 2023	0	-	3	21-25	21-25	12-25			SEC	17	-	18
11	34	Feb 18, 2024	2	-	3	29-27	25-22	14-25	20-25	10-15	SEC	17	-	19
11	36	Feb 18, 2024	3	- (n)	2	22-25	25-14	25-21	23-25	25-23	TMVL Shield	18	-	19
12	4	May 06, 2024	0	-	3	18-25	17-25	21-25			SEC	19	-	19
12	13	May 27, 2024	1	-	3	20-25	25-27	25-21	20-25		SEC	19	-	20
12	19	Jun 03, 2024	0	-	3	26-28	12-25	13-25			SEC Tournament12-19Quarterfinals SEC Tournament	20	-	20
13	8	Sep 29, 2024	3	-	2	21-25	25-17	23-25	25-22	15-7	SEC	21	-	20
13	34	Nov 17, 2024	0	-	3	16-25	20-25	23-25			SEC	22	-	20
14	5	Dec 22, 2024	3	-	0	25-21	25-16	25-19			SEC	23	-	20
14	39	Mar 02, 2025	3	-	1	25-17	25-22	18-25	26-24		SEC	23	-	21
15	1	Jun 08, 2025	0	-	3	21-25	22-25	15-25			SEC	23	-	22
15	10	Jun 29, 2025	0	-	3	19-25	21-25	19-25			SEC	24	-	22

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.