Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

WGM Cup Group (2)

Competition Info | Bracket Link | Why Do I Care?

Sheboygan Vampire Bats

John Holden

(N)
Neutral Court

Santa Clara Chihuahuas

Martyn Hathaway

Sheboygan leads series 13-7

Match Comments

Will be an interesting one

John (Sheboygan) Sep 20 - 10:49 PM

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Sheboygan			Santa Clara
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
93.00	A	Libero		A	90.25
75.63	B-	Middle Blockers		C+	71.50
80.75	B	Outside Hitters		C	68.75
90.75	A	Right Side		B+	82.25
83.25	B+	Setter		C+	71.75
		Skills Prediction

	20 MATCHES
13	WINS	7
7	HOME	3
3	AWAY	1
3	NEUTRAL	3

Sheboygan		Santa Clara
#14	ELO Rank	#32

1,507.11	ELO Rating	1,293.59

58.2%	ELO Winning Chance	41.8%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.312 24th	ATTACK PCT	.254 32nd
11.90 28th	KILLS PER SET	11.42 32nd
.876 1st	SERVE PCT	.834 32nd
1.7 9th	ACES PER SET	1.05 32nd
.496 28th	ASSIST PCT	.466 32nd
11.22 29th	ASSISTS PER SET	10.99 32nd
3.66 30th	BLOCKS PER SET	3.88 26th
6.26 26th	DIGS PER SET	6.53 14th
.905 32nd	RECEIVE PCT	.923 13th
2.113 30th	PASSER RATING	2.175 14th

	TOP TWO
McNaughton (RS) 351 Gardini (OH) 212	KILLS	Morrow (RS) 286 Skinner (OH) 202
McNaughton (RS) .582 Gardini (OH) .516	ATTACK PCT	Le Goff (MB) .451 Morrow (RS) .334
Reinhold (S) 984 Pennyslider (S) 259	ASSISTS	Roche (S) 819 Sheridan (S) 227
McNaughton (RS) 45 Guffy (L) 38	ACES	Alvarez (L) 23 Le Goff (MB) 22
Crispsyrup (MB) 64 Brockmann (MB) 64	BLOCKS	Le Goff (MB) 68 Woods (MB) 64
Guffy (L) 159 Reinhold (S) 104	DIGS	Alvarez (L) 193 Morrow (RS) 105
Lafitte (L) 2.53 Guffy (L) 2.34	PASSER RTG	Alvarez (L) 2.46 van der Veer (L) 2.21

#	TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
2.	Cesar Alvarez Senior A 2.46 Passer Rating 2.35 Digs Per Set	7.75
8.	Bauer Guffy Senior A 2.34 Passer Rating 2.09 Digs Per Set	6.87

#		TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
3.		Gage McNaughton Senior A 4.56 Kills Per Set 0.44 Blocks Per Set	7.83

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	4	Aug 29, 2020	3	-	0	25-14	25-7	25-20			Western Conference	1	-	0
1	15	Sep 19, 2020	0	-	3	18-25	20-25	14-25			Western Conference	2	-	0
2	7	Jan 30, 2021	3	- (n)	0	25-18	25-15	25-23			William G. Morgan Cup2-7Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	3	-	0
2	11	Feb 13, 2021	2	-	3	19-25	21-25	25-21	25-23	13-15	Western Conference	3	-	1
2	22	Feb 27, 2021	0	-	3	17-25	11-25	18-25			Western Conference Tournament2-22Quarterfinals Western Conference Tournament	4	-	1
2	28	Mar 13, 2021	1	-	3	21-25	25-23	13-25	20-25		Western Conference	5	-	1
2	42	Apr 03, 2021	3	- (n)	1	25-23	18-25	25-22	25-22		TMVL Cup	6	-	1
3	11	Sep 11, 2021	0	-	3	17-25	23-25	23-25			Western Conference	7	-	1
3	22	Sep 25, 2021	0	-	3	10-25	12-25	13-25			Western Conference Tournament3-22Quarterfinals Western Conference Tournament	8	-	1
3	28	Oct 09, 2021	0	-	3	17-25	18-25	26-28			Western Conference	8	-	2
4	5	Dec 04, 2021	3	-	0	39-37	27-25	25-18			Western Conference	9	-	2
4	24	Jan 08, 2022	1	-	3	25-22	15-25	17-25	24-26		Western Conference	10	-	2
5	6	Apr 16, 2022	0	- (n)	3	16-25	18-25	12-25			William G. Morgan Cup5-6Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	10	-	3
5	18	May 14, 2022	2	-	3	28-26	21-25	25-18	21-25	12-15	Non-Conference	10	-	4
8	33	Apr 16, 2023	3	- (n)	0	25-17	25-15	25-22			Holyoke Invitational8-33Sweet 16 Holyoke Invitational	11	-	4
9	6	Jun 04, 2023	1	- (n)	3	25-23	20-25	18-25	24-26		William G. Morgan Cup9-6Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	11	-	5
9	21	Jul 09, 2023	2	-	3	17-25	20-25	26-24	25-17	16-18	Non-Conference	12	-	5
10	21	Oct 22, 2023	3	-	2	22-25	25-19	25-19	31-33	15-12	Non-Conference	13	-	5
14	6	Dec 22, 2024	1	- (n)	3	25-23	20-25	16-25	21-25		William G. Morgan Cup14-6Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	13	-	6
15	12	Jun 29, 2025	3	-	0	25-20	25-22	25-15			William G. Morgan Cup15-12Round of 32 William G. Morgan Cup	13	-	7
16	6	Sep 21, 2025	0	- (n)	3	21-25	14-25	23-25			William G. Morgan Cup16-6Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	13	-	8

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.